Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Antenna\s+is\s+up\,\s+but\s+the\s+coupler\s+doesn\'t\s+like\s+160\s+meters\s*$/: 56 ]

Total 56 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] Antenna is up, but the coupler doesn't like 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:28:53 -0400
jim, there are two wires, one of each side, that are 131 feet long. they meet in the middle at the support and continue down 175 ish feet into the shack to a 1:1 current balun. I use 'Snaplock' space
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00247.html (10,785 bytes)

42. Re: [TenTec] Antenna is up, but the coupler doesn't like 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:38:50 -0400
aren't they also called 'center feed zepp' antennas? Mike, WB8VGE SunLight Energy Systems The Heathkit Shop http://www.theheathkitshop.com/ J e e p o|||||||o A man with one clock knows what time it i
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00249.html (13,387 bytes)

43. Re: [TenTec] Antenna is up, but the coupler doesn't like 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:15:15 -0400
well poop.... I'm laying in bed playing this all out in my head. I sure want to use this antenna for the 160 meter contest coming up mike Mike, WB8VGE SunLight Energy Systems The Heathkit Shop http:/
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00250.html (17,834 bytes)

44. Re: [TenTec] Antenna is up, but the coupler doesn't like 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:19:29 -0400
that experiment will have to wait until I can get down to the shack.. mike Mike Bryce, WB8VGE the heathkit shop SunLight energy systems J e e p o|||||||o _____________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00251.html (10,155 bytes)

45. Re: [TenTec] Antenna is up, but the coupler doesn't like 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:36:55 -0700
The feedpoint impedance of this antenna is close to 50 ohms on 160M. Feeding it with high impedance open wire line is an unnatural act! It's no surprise that you can't match it. Replace that open wir
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00253.html (11,085 bytes)

46. Re: [TenTec] Antenna is up, but the coupler doesn't like 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:06:23 -0400
I'll give it a try when i am back on my feet. Looks like a zipper down the front me. I wonder why the thing works so good on the other bands. tunes right up. I am going to order the 470 pf doorknobs
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00255.html (12,365 bytes)

47. Re: [TenTec] Antenna is up, but the coupler doesn't like 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Mcgraw" <rmcgraw@blomand.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:34:44 -0500 (CDT)
The antenna at 50 ft and its present length will look more like 20 to 25 ohms on 160M The "600" ohm feed should work OK. The length of the line appears to be a large part of the issue. Change the lin
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00256.html (14,090 bytes)

48. Re: [TenTec] Antenna is up, but the coupler doesn't like 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:41:29 -0500
If C is at max this clearly indicates the need for external capacitity. This can be connected to the terminals on the rear. Typically 1000 pf should be adequate. I find that necessary on my installat
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00265.html (17,233 bytes)

49. Re: [TenTec] Antenna is up, but the coupler doesn't like 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:43:15 -0500
Good choices. I'm still saying that an adjustment in feed line length is necessary. Add some 10 ft and see what improves. Also try the internal balun. You might find it works OK. 73 Bob, K4TAX bob, s
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00266.html (19,111 bytes)

50. Re: [TenTec] Antenna is up, but the coupler doesn't like 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:58:10 -0500
Very good analysis. 73 Bob, K4TAX Mike, Modeling your doublet with EZNEC+ ver 5.0.59 and making 3 assumptions: 1. The antenna is in a straight line 2. Each end slopes down from 50 ft to 10 ft above t
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00267.html (16,746 bytes)

51. Re: [TenTec] Antenna is up, but the coupler doesn't like 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Haigwood" <jerry@w5jh.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 18:34:23 -0500
Bob and the group, If Mike would extend his feed line to 241 feet (as you have been saying), he would have an SWR at the end of the line of about 2.5-3.0. This is a SWR that can be easily matched by
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00268.html (18,906 bytes)

52. Re: [TenTec] Antenna is up, but the coupler doesn't like 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 19:41:01 -0400
What in the world would I do with all the feedline? That's 60 feet Mike wb8vge Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00269.html (11,470 bytes)

53. Re: [TenTec] Antenna is up, but the coupler doesn't like 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Haigwood" <jerry@w5jh.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 19:00:25 -0500
You can drape it from a tree, wooden pole, etc. As long as it is not near any metal, it will be fine. Get creative here. Do not wind it on itself and keep it 12 inchs away from itself (i.e. do not le
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00270.html (12,434 bytes)

54. Re: [TenTec] Antenna is up, but the coupler doesn't like 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: "Marsh Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:19:54 -0500
Thanks Bob. 73, Marsh, KA5M Very good analysis. 73 Bob, K4TAX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/te
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00294.html (18,447 bytes)

55. Re: [TenTec] Antenna is up, but the coupler doesn't like 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: "Marsh Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 19:54:21 -0500
Jim, Your suggestion to add 33 uH in series with each leg of the 600-ohm openwire feedline for 160M operation should do the job. Mike, I'd be interested to know how you end up resolving this. Wishing
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00310.html (11,873 bytes)

56. Re: [TenTec] Antenna is up, but the coupler doesn't like 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:47:15 +0200
I still prefer the feedline extension over coils. About 10 years ago there was a short article in QST (or perhaps CQ Magazine) which showed how one guy solved this problem. He built himself the skele
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00322.html (13,477 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu