Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Any\s+reason\s+not\s+to\s+use\s+960p\/s\s+with\s+Omni\s+V\?\s+\(no\s+message\)\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Any reason not to use 960p/s with Omni V? (no message) (score: 1)
Author: "louis garrison" <k5msy@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 02:31:57 -0500
_________________________________________________________________ Don?t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ _________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00221.html (6,901 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Any reason not to use 960p/s with Omni V? (no message) (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <n4nt_m_o_hyder@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 07:29:34 -0500
960 exceeds V by CML. This will create an inverted nomenclature designation. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00222.html (7,498 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Any reason not to use 960p/s with Omni V? (no message) (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Zond" <k3miy@csonline.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 09:40:00 -0500
960 exceeds V by CMLV. Quintius Flavius Minimus told me I was his star pupil in math (Roman) back in 150 AD. Oh, for the good old days. Ron K3MIY --Original Message-- From: tentec-bounces@contesting.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00224.html (8,471 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Any reason not to use 960p/s with Omni V? (no message) (score: 1)
Author: Philip Leonard WV&Oslash;T <leolists@seidkr.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 08:46:00 -0600
Don't you mean CL AD? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00226.html (7,699 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu