Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Any\s+update\s+on\s+a\s+replacement\s+for\s+the\s+Orion\s+II\?\s*$/: 67 ]

Total 67 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] Any update on a replacement for the Orion II? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 23:18:26 -0400
Well Wade, while you're on the subject... As some of you know, I recently sent my Argonaut 505 to a new home. It was not a decision I made lightly, but the opportunity to pick up an Omni VII was just
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00127.html (14,318 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] Any update on a replacement for the Orion II? (score: 1)
Author: Toby Pennington <w4cakk@centurylink.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 23:27:21 -0400
I have been reading this thread and hearing of the longing of many to see a rig of the Orion caliber. I hate to disappoint many, but this may, I say may, never happen! One primary reason is that in t
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00128.html (10,236 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] Any update on a replacement for the Orion II? (score: 1)
Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 01:53:33 -0400
However I never once said that Omni-Rig was the reason that for this, because it's not. James made that bit up himself. -- Sheesh... got a case of selective amnesia, Rick??? Can I have some of what
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00129.html (11,387 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] Any update on a replacement for the Orion II? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 08:23:04 +0200
As Seymour Cray (creator of the Supercomputer) once said... "Pioneers are the ones with the arrows in their backs!" Generally speaking, in respect of making a profit and staying in business, it is ge
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00130.html (10,916 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] Any update on a replacement for the Orion II? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 09:54:10 +0200
You took the point out of context of the rest of the paragraph, James. As a stand-alone point it is not true - not because the missing Omni-Rig support in unimportant, but rather because most people
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00132.html (13,687 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] Any update on a replacement for the Orion II? (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 10:13:17 +0000
Toby, I appreciate your reasoning but I don't agree in this specific case. Ten-Tec has a strong, established, well proven, high performance HF platform to build on. It has matured seamlessly through
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00135.html (9,653 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] Any update on a replacement for the Orion II? (score: 1)
Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 22:32:13 -0400
First you make a statement. Then you say: "However I never once said that Omni-Rig was the reason that for this, because it's not. James made that bit up himself." What a colossal waste of time. Sorr
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00180.html (14,762 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu