Yes, I know the 7000 covers more VHF bands, but at HF and 6m, Does anyone have side by side operations comparisons? I am aware of the receiver tests by Sherwood. Good source. I have seen some favorab
I would still recommend the Omni VII. Things are happening for it, and it has great specifications. We use multiple Omni VIIs and K-3s at our contest station. The guys like the Omni VII, and it holds
That's an important "if". On the other hand, IF you need excellent immunity from strong adjacent cw signals, I'd go for a down converting rig with narrow roofing filters at the first i.f. (i.e., Eagl
I have both..The OMNI is better, but the Eagle blows both away George, W6GF That's an important "if". On the other hand, IF you need excellent immunity from strong adjacent cw signals, I'd go for a
Like my new TS-590s ? -- Happy Trails. == Richards / K8JHR == _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/te
Yes, like your TS-590S, except on 30M, 17M, 12M, and 10M where the TS-590S up converts to 73Mhz with a wide roofing filter. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@
I don't know; do you like your new TS-590S? (I would think you would.) Have you been able to compare it to the Eagle? 73, Frank KF6E Like my new TS-590s ? -- Happy Trails. == Richards / K8JHR == ____
I like the new rig, but have not been able to compare it directly to an Eagle. It was a very difficult decision. My Omni VII was in the shop at the time, and I wanted a "backup" rig, and this one had
The TS-590S specs might compare favorably with the TT-599, but personally having all eggs in the Ten-Tec basket doesn't seem a bad thing. A friend's TS-50 quit recently, and mfg service told him they
Yes. I agree with your assessment. It was a very difficult decision, with so many little nuances and considerations. The service factor weighed heavy in the process, but I figure I am getting in on t