Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Anyone\s+own\s+Omni6\s+and\s+TS2000\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Anyone\s+own\s+Omni6\s+and\s+TS2000\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Anyone own Omni6 and TS2000? (score: 1): Author: msadams@acsu.buffalo.edu (Mark S. Adams, P.E.); Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 18:19:28 -0000; Hi Gang, I hate to even bring this up, but I am on the brink of selling my Omni 6, Opt 3 with filters. As I get deeper into VHF+ contesting I find that cannot afford both the Omni and the new hardwar; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00190.html (7,497 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Anyone own Omni6 and TS2000? (score: 1): Author: N4LQ@igLou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 03:21:18 -0000; I had two Omni 6 (plain) and now have the TS-2000. To answer your questions: 1. The TS-2000 because A. Audio is much better for voice modes. Up to 5khz bandwidth can be selected. With a big speaker o; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00194.html (9,909 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Anyone own Omni6 and TS2000? (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 12:37:37 -0700; Hi, Mark, Do what you have to do, but I just took another look at the Omni Six product review (in January 1993 QST) and the TS-2000 product review (in July 2001 QST). I like the oscilloscope screen s; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00224.html (12,016 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]