Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Anyone\s+using\s+TT\-1775\s+mini\-dipole\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Anyone\s+using\s+TT\-1775\s+mini\-dipole\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Anyone using TT-1775 mini-dipole? (score: 1): Author: "W.D. (Doc) Lindsey" <dock0evz@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:22:56 -0600; Gang: Can anyone please give me your impressions of the MFJ 1775 rotary mini-dipole? I am intrigued by its 6-band coverage, small overall dimensions, and light weight. As a QRPer I know there is no "; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00679.html (7,670 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Anyone using TT-1775 mini-dipole? (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:42:48 -0500; Handicap on top of handicap. But less of a handicap than no antenna at all. Personally, I prefer the longest wire convenient to erect center fed with a high impedance balanced line and a versatile tu; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00684.html (8,306 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]