Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Argonaut\s+V\s+or\s+Jupiter\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Argonaut\s+V\s+or\s+Jupiter\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: "Kirk Braunius" <kbraunius@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 12:21:21 -0400; I am planning to sell my Triton 540 and Century 21 to buy either an Argonaut or a Jupiter. Obviously I prefer the Argo based on price (it would also allow me to sell my 963 ps to put toward it; I alr; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00112.html (7,572 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: RaySoifer@cs.com; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 12:25:06 EDT; The Argo V is a great rig. I've had mine for 2 years and I never get tired of it. But, it runs only 20 W and is not designed to drive an amp. If you want more power than that, go for the Jupiter. 73,; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00113.html (7,036 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: "Ron Zond" <k3miy@csonline.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:15:53 -0400; hi Ray The Argo will drive an amp, however, it doesn't have provision for applying ALC to an amp. Great rig!I've had mine for over four years. Ron K3MIY much put The Argo V is a great rig. I've had m; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00114.html (8,531 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: RaySoifer@cs.com; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:41:12 EDT; You must be using some form of RF sensing or some other means of amp control, since the Argo V doesn't have a relay-control jack. 73, Ray _______________________________________________ TenTec mailin; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00116.html (7,018 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: "Ron Zond" <k3miy@csonline.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 14:45:57 -0400; Ray The amp is a yaesu FL110, and it uses RF sensing for keying. No full QSK. Ron You must be using some form of RF sensing or some other means of amp control, since the Argo V doesn't have a relay-c; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00118.html (8,157 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: John Graves <jh.graves@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 13:33:24 -0400; Kirk, Buy the Argo...and if it is not enough....try this: http://www.thp.co.jp/thp%20hp%20Eng/amateur_eng/hf_eng.htm#100bdx By the way..I own a Jupiter and love it. I use it on SSB and drive it with; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00121.html (7,895 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: RaySoifer@cs.com; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:48:03 EDT; Maybe it's my poor web-surfing skills, but it doesn't look like the 10W-input amps are available in the US. HRO carries the 1.5 kW job, but it requires 85W. Do you know of a source? 73, Ray W2RS ____; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00127.html (8,035 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: RaySoifer@cs.com; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:55:12 EDT; Hi Ron, I thought so! Looks like a good solution to me, but I don't work QSK much. My main amp here is a 30L-1 which can be driven either with my Orion II (through an Ameritron ARB-704 interface) or; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00128.html (7,965 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: "B. Lee Cornwell" <k2blc@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:37:25 -0500 (GMT-05:00); Here is a simple amp control circuit: http://home.earthlink.net/~k2blc/ I've used it for a 30L-1 and Al-811 73 Lee K2BLC --Original Message-- _______________________________________________ TenTec ma; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00129.html (8,914 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Whitman" <wwhitman@fastmail.fm>; Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 17:25:18 -0500; Kirk, I have never used the Jupiter so I can't comment on it. I have had an Argonaut since last August and it is wonderful. I won't compare it to my Orion II since they are rather different animals,; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00130.html (9,750 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: ron <roncasa@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 18:36:52 -0400; Overload?? Overload?? Wayne, I use this in contests and this baby survived it, never experienced any "overload". ;-) Ron, wb1hga "the 516 is a keeper but got an eye on the 7" ________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00131.html (8,549 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: John Graves <jh.graves@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 19:57:06 -0400; Ray, They have been selling via the internet. An email to them should get a prompt response. I occasionally read the ML and see very very few complaints. The ML is on Yahoo and I don't know if it is; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00133.html (9,334 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Whitman" <wwhitman@fastmail.fm>; Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 20:17:15 -0500; Hmmmm, well Ron, maybe 'overload' isn't the correct term. What I notice, is when a very strong cw signal is very close to frequency, the receiver sensitivity decreases when the strong signal keys, to; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00140.html (10,133 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 19:28:10 -0600; FCC rules on amplifiers have been prohibiting any with that low an input because they would be appropriate for illegal use on CB. Since the amplifier is linear that 1.5 KW out amplifier that took 85; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00141.html (9,445 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: Paul <designer@quickdata.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 09:36:59 -0700; Wayne, Aren't you just seeing the AGC (automatic gain control) at work? Note that for simplicity, the ArgoV does not give you access to this setting. You don't have On/OFF, you don't have Fast/Slow (; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00153.html (8,124 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: "HENRY R MACKEY" <kb9cqo@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 13:10:57 -0400; Kirk, My suggestion is that you should base your decision on the type of rig you want. If your intentions are to have a full coverage HF transceiver, the Jupiter is the best choice. If you are intere; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00154.html (9,066 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: "Bill Rowlett" <kc4atu@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 17:35:45 +0000; How can tell him he will be disappointed in a rig that you have never owned. You know the Jupitor, so keep your comments there. The Argonaut is also a full coverage rig and is a very good SWL receive; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00156.html (10,851 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Whitman" <wwhitman@fastmail.fm>; Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 12:54:03 -0500; Thanks for clearing that up Paul. You are probably correct, it is just the agc doing it's thing. Some capability to adjust the agc would have been really nice, but there's not much to complain about; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00157.html (9,340 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: "John WA4JM" <wa4jm@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 20:39:03 -0400; You can't ask me. I own a Jupiter and thing about buying an Argonaut.. Go Figure -- Original Message -- From: <RaySoifer@cs.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 4:55 PM Subje; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00159.html (10,554 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1): Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 11:28:01 -0400; I suspect that with the relaxation of the FCC rules on external amps, that Ten-Tec and others may soon offer an external amp. I run my Scout portable at 30 W output and have always found this power l; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00160.html (11,410 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]