Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Aux\s+I\/O\s+connection\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: "John B. Egger" <john_egger@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:48:03 -0400
I'm hoping to get started on digital modes (other than CW, that is) but face a problem right at the start. My computer has "Speaker out" (used for its speakers), "Line In," and "Mic In" jacks (all 1/
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00233.html (7,618 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: "John B. Egger" <john_egger@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:53:16 -0400
Sorry... Forgot to mention that I'm using an O2. While I'm fixing things (wish posts could be edited), it's just my assumption that the computer's line-in and mic-in jacks are stereo. -- John Registe
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00234.html (7,623 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Zond" <k3miy@csonline.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:58:57 -0400
John The speaker out will serve. I use it with no problems. Adjust your soundcard accordingly 73 Ron K3MIY I'm hoping to get started on digital modes (other than CW, that is) but face a problem right
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00235.html (8,728 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: "Jack B. Friend" <jfriend31@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:59:22 -0600
John, if you look at your manual and the I/O cable that comes with the Orion, you will note that cable has red, white, black and yellow ends. all are phono plugs. get a 1/8" adapter for each to plug
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00236.html (8,411 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Zond" <k3miy@csonline.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:01:40 -0400
John FLDIGI is fast becoming the standard for digi. In WPA, the group is working on using it for emcomm. Ron K3MIY Sorry... Forgot to mention that I'm using an O2. While I'm fixing things (wish posts
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00237.html (8,880 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: "Stephen Cannon" <sugar_bears_home@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:26:36 -0600
Jack, Are the other two cables from the Orion II Aux I/O port plug (the red and black cables) supposed to be connected? Stephen --Original Message-- John, if you look at your manual and the I/O cable
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00238.html (9,512 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 07:33:08 -0500
RED is for FSK input and BLACK is for PTT. Normally not needed to be connected with a sound card. 73 Bob, K4TAX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00239.html (10,597 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: "Jack B. Friend" <jfriend31@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:43:02 -0600
Stephen the RED on the Orion 1 is for "future" assignment ... the BLACK is for PTT on the Orion 1 ... i do not know what the O2's changes may be in that regard. i have neer used the PTT as i have no
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00240.html (10,166 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Williams" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 08:23:18 -0600
Jack, If you are going to operate RTTY, I would highly suggest you "connect" the red and black cables and forget about the soundcard for AFSK. The O2 is much better suited for FSK RTTY; and in fact w
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00243.html (13,236 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: "Jack B. Friend" <jfriend31@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 08:43:08 -0600
Dick, i will print this information for future reference. i have never operated RTTY, only CW and occasional PSK31. should i wish to move that direction i will surely look carefully at the RigBlaster
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00244.html (14,313 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: "pfizenmayer" <pfizenmayer2@q.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 09:02:53 -0700
I have always liked to homebrew but anymore seems like the doggone parts end up costing more than buying something off the shelf - and my junk box is msotly stuff 30 years old !!! I do have a homebre
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00246.html (10,699 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: "pfizenmayer" <pfizenmayer2@q.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 09:39:50 -0700
Sorry for BW - was intended to be to Dick Williams - forgot this reflector replies to Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment and did not alter the "to:" Hank K7HP ___________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00248.html (8,383 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 09:48:13 -0700
That's correct, but only because the pins in the cable provided by TT are different from the pins on the back of the radio. I built a DIN jumper that puts the red phono connector in contact with the
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00249.html (12,646 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:00:16 -0500
Yes, true, but what about the other 20 or so current digital modes that are available these days? These are efficient with highly reliable data throughput modes as opposed to the slow antiquated RTTY
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00252.html (15,389 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Zond" <k3miy@csonline.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:15:19 -0400
Bob the design of modern rigs dictate the use (or non use) of soundcard interfaces. The TT Argo V permits direct connection, perhaps other TT rigs do this as well. It would be great if rigs had the s
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00253.html (16,318 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Williams" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:42:18 -0600
Bob, No doubt that other digital modes are highly reliable and in many cases are better than RTTY; however, it depends on what your interests are within the hobby. For a DXer (like myself), I see ver
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00254.html (18,002 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: Martin Ewing <martin.s.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:19:03 -0400
I've been around since the AM era, myself, but I don't see how DSB AM doesn't take at least twice the bandwidth of SSB for the same voice input. 73 Martin AA6E _______________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00256.html (9,220 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:24:40 -0600
Except that some with dilusions of broadcast voice grandure transmit 6 KHz or more of audio bandwidth. 73, Jerry, K0CQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@conte
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00257.html (9,529 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: Martin Ewing <martin.s.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:37:22 -0400
X kHz SSB -> 2*X kHz AM DSB (more actually, since there is some SSB bass cutoff > 0 Hz) Choose your X. I wonder if anyone still does DSB suppressed carrier? That was a lot easier to generate and stil
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00258.html (9,904 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:57:52 -0600
That's 6 KHz of audio bandwidth on SSB. They accomplish little but splatter and transmitting the noise of their dog barking and the fans on their computer in most of that bandwidth. Hollingsworth was
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00259.html (12,455 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu