- 1. [TenTec] BPL suit (score: 1)
- Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@charter.net>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 09:56:13 -0500
- After reading BPL comments both here and on Towertalk for weeks, no one has come up with a solution. As much as I disagree with most Attorneys (even my brother in law), I watched a small claim agains
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00641.html (34,400 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] BPL suit (score: 1)
- Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:19:24 -0700
- On Friday, April 30, 2004, at 07:56 AM, WD4K wrote: on a big dog. Merely an irritation. Segway to the 1000-100,000-200,000 (pick a number) hams and communications equipment users simply signing a pap
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00644.html (9,496 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] BPL suit (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 12:10:46 -1000
- a 500 million-one Billion (pick a number) dollar class action suit that involved Whoa, where do you get this number? 100,000 Amateurs with $5,000 investment each, in HF/ low VHF equipment, which BPL
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00656.html (8,672 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu