Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Basic\s+question\s+\(especially\s+NR\s+operation\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Basic question (especially NR operation) (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 11:05:54 -0400
Rick, your description below about the NR performance on the Orion prompted me to go back to the Doug's and Scott's writeup on Weak Signal DXing, etc. It was my original impression that the NR functi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00109.html (11,171 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Basic question (especially NR operation) (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 09:02:00 -0700
The NR value adjusts the speed of adaptation, not the amount of NR. A lower value provides a relatively slow adaptation speed, so that once the filter is built it will tend to persist and will chang
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00111.html (9,150 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Basic question (especially NR operation) (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 10:43:03 -0700
I forgot the obvious comment ... No, you do not need to cycle the NR off and on again if the signal changes. It will adapt on its own. Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTe
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00116.html (9,969 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Basic question (especially NR operation) (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 15:19:09 -0400
If this applies to Orion - I'd do the same. Suggestion of reducing RF GAIN applies to TS850, MP and similar rigs. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN _______________________________________________ TenTec maili
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00124.html (8,623 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Basic question (especially NR operation) (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 19:43:46 -0400
Actually, Sinisa, I was referring to your FB writeup on the Orion where you recommend backing off on the RF gain until the S-meter drops back about 12 dB(?) or so. It was your first step in optimizin
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00141.html (9,583 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Basic question (especially NR operation) (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 04:23:37 -0400
No, I've never recommended such a thing, you misread it. In my text 12 dB refers to the difference between external noise level and RX internal noise level. The adjustment is performed by using contr
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00151.html (8,787 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Basic question (especially NR operation) (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 10:07:44 -0400
OK, Grant. While I think I understood the concept of "aggressiveness," I was off track regarding whether it changed its state automatically with changing S/N or one had to help it manually, as I desc
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00161.html (10,763 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Basic question (especially NR operation) (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 19:08:54 -0400
OK, Sinisa. I didn't have your paper in front of me when I sent message. 73, Joe Sinisa Hristov wrote: Joe Giacobello wrote: Actually, Sinisa, I was referring to your FB writeup on the Orion where yo
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00202.html (9,882 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu