Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Being\s+A\s+Contrarian\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Being\s+A\s+Contrarian\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Being A Contrarian (score: 1): Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:12:04 -0400; Buck K4IA wrote.... I thought the QST review was fairly negative. A lot of "damning by slight praise." The overall tone of the review was negative with lots of side remarks about shortcomings: "it do; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00821.html (8,569 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Being a Contrarian (score: 1): Author: "OE3ZK Gert" <oe3zk@aon.at>; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:30:15 +0200; John The truth is, that after two years you get a IC-7800 hardware upgrade for $ 500,-- from ICOM. It consists of a 3rd roofing filter, a new 2nd LO (10db less phase noise) and further improvements i; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00041.html (9,337 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian (score: 1): Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 07:48:58 -0400; And how much input do users have in the feature set and firmware updates of the IC-7800? A $10K radio and you can't even tune both receivers with the same vfo. 73, Barry N1EU ________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00043.html (6,963 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]