Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Being\s+a\s+Contrarian\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Being\s+a\s+Contrarian\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian.... (score: 1): Author: "OE3ZK Gert" <oe3zk@aon.at>; Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:23:06 +0200; I am watching the discussion about the ORION-I & -II firmware problems for a few years in this group. Is it really so hard to write stable code for a "well designed" radio? I am also comparing to the; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00020.html (7,119 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian.... (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 11:59:57 -0700; Gut gesagt, Gerd. Hier ist eine Klassiche beispiel von der Unterschiedt zwischen Deutsche und Amerikanische Dinkweise. Wir liegen mehr Wert auf Qualitaet, und die liegen mehr wert auf schnelle "chang; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00024.html (8,605 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian.... (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 15:21:56 -0400; Nor do I, Gert. But, the numbers keep me from wasting my time and money on radios that don't have even a slight chance of pleasing me. Especially when those numbers are confirmed by more than one sou; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00026.html (7,267 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian.... (score: 1): Author: Martin Ewing <aa6e@ewing.homedns.org>; Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 19:27:13 -0400; There are many of us Amerikaners who appreciate value and quality, also! It would have been great to have all the bugs out before the product shipped... I would be happy to consider another product (; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00027.html (9,911 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian.... (score: 1): Author: John Sheeley <wb4qda@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:25:37 -0700 (PDT); Gert I don't believe you can compare programming SDR radio with the IC 7800 or the ftdx 9000 type radios which are hardware based and 2 to 3 times the price.All The 7800s are getting new power suppli; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00031.html (9,436 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian.... (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 23:37:58 -0400; Just the opposite - IC7800 is more SDR and less hardware based than Orion. That is, Orion performs three frequency conversions before going to DSP, and IC7800 only two. Also, Icom uses twice as many; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00040.html (7,621 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian.... (score: 1): Author: Dave Heil <k8mn@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 05:20:09 +0000; I'm with you. All of Icom's powerful signal processors have not resulted in a receiver which can match the Orion. I'm working 160m and 80m DX I'd have never worked with my Omni VI Option 3, which I'd; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00095.html (8,706 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]