Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Boeing\s+and\s+IEEE\s+NOI\s+Comments\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Boeing\s+and\s+IEEE\s+NOI\s+Comments\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Boeing and IEEE NOI Comments (score: 1): Author: Don Rasmussen <wb8yqj@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 08:57:11 -0700 (PDT); Boeing and IEEE NOI Comments Boeing http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=65\16183088 IEEE http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00098.html (7,582 bytes)
2. RE: [TenTec] Boeing and IEEE NOI Comments (score: 1): Author: "David Price" <wa4et@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 16:56:39 +0000; WOW, makes some intersting reading, just more amunition to bury BPL. As least there seems to be some big money stepping into the room with more clout than the ARRL At least somebody else has said wha; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00102.html (8,925 bytes)
3. RE: [TenTec] Boeing and IEEE NOI Comments (score: 1): Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>; Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 15:59:53 -0700; Dear Uncle DAvid, << and feed it to the dogs >> I do not eat the contents of whited sepulchres. Stub-wags, Big Max (VA7OJ's Boxer) http://www.qsl.net/ab4oj/max/max.html ______________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00110.html (7,440 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Boeing and IEEE NOI Comments (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 18:41:00 -0500; There is no question of BPL being legal to start up, under existing part 15 rules, just how it should be regulated and measured. Part 15 does not adequately address other than single device radiators; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00111.html (7,542 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Boeing and IEEE NOI Comments (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 18:16:02 -1000; There is no question of BPL being legal to start up, under existing part 15 rules, just how it should be regulated and measured. There is also no question that when BPL is identified as causing harmf; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00114.html (8,434 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Boeing and IEEE NOI Comments (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 08:05:19 -0500; I agree with Ken. It seems that the FCC has become a passive player in the enforcement role. Getting any enforcement action is a very very difficult issue. Just look at the recent issue regarding K1M; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00117.html (9,284 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]