Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Built\s+in\s+SWR\s+meter\s+bannans\s*$/: 53 ]

Total 53 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: Jim GM <jim.gmforum@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 11:13:11 -0500
I have a Tec Tec Auto Coupler that is turned off and a Ten Tec Hercules II at full power. The SWR bridges in side the equipment reads well over SWR over 3:1 on certain bands while my BIRD Watt meter
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00212.html (7,086 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 14:54:40 -0600
would an unun help to keep common mode current from flowing? jack ak7o I have a Tec Tec Auto Coupler that is turned off and a Ten Tec Hercules II at full power. The SWR bridges in side the equipment
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00214.html (8,253 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:51:59 -0500
By definition, no. You almost certainly are enjoying an unbalanced current on your feed line, likely a current on the outside of the coax shield causing an erroneous reading. You'll need to alleviate
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00216.html (8,759 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 17:57:17 -0500
Sounds like RF current on the shield when on the antenna and not on the dummy load. I suggest a 1:1 UNUN balun between the amp and the antenna. I've had good success with a product from The Wireman b
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00218.html (8,871 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 19:23:50 -0500
Maybe "unun" and "balun" don't really apply here. Walt Maxwell, W2DU, and Lew McCoy, W1ICP, were famously at odds about whether the W2DU "balun" was really a balun or something else. Walt said yes, L
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00219.html (10,263 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 20:26:19 -0500
Semantics.......be it a UNbalanced to UNbalanced Balun, RF Common Mode Choke, 1:1 balun, RF Choke or whatever, yes the objective is to provide a high Z for circulating current on the outside of a coa
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00220.html (12,375 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 09:15:21 +0200
With openwire you can build a CMC choke just as easily as with coax. Only thing is, you have to build two of them so it costs twice as much. In fact you make your own coax CMC choke by placing beads
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00223.html (11,810 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:10:02 +0200
In theory, yes, provided that the choke impedance is much higher than antenna impedance. In practice, this means choke impedance >=10 kOhm, which can be achieved only with special attention, and the
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00224.html (9,417 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:26:26 +0200
Sinisa, If you will agree to raise that value to 1000 Ohms, then I will agree with you. Often, 1000 Ohms is enough. Steve (G3TXQ) has a nice chart showing impedances for various choke technologies. S
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00225.html (11,263 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:36:12 +0200
Bob, On the 8231 and 8232, do you know how many beads each type uses? Do you know exactly which bead is used? 73 Rick Semantics.......be it a UNbalanced to UNbalanced Balun, RF Common Mode Choke, 1:1
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00226.html (13,553 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:23:26 +0000 (UTC)
I don't understand. in coax you are increasing rhe impedence to the common mode current on the shield, right? What would you be doing on the open wire? 73 Dave WA3F With openwire you can build a CMC
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00227.html (12,080 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:53:33 +0200
Dave, Sorry, my memory failed me there. It was long ago that I did this. I had to search for my notes and drawings (file). Found them. Actually I removed the center cable from coax, and discarded the
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00228.html (13,259 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:37:42 +0000 (UTC)
Thanks, Rick. Your work is always interresting and I was afraid I needed a cup of coffee, hi 73 es gud DX Dave WA3F -- Original Message -- From: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de> To: "Discussion
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00229.html (13,981 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: "Walt K8CV" <waltk8cv4612amos@att.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:16:18 -0400
Sorry, I find this a wee bit hard to swallow. I picture a big lump of large toroids, with two plastic pieces of coax jacket going through them, with one wire in each that connect to the open wire. Th
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00230.html (15,549 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:50:01 +0100
What Rick reported is perfectly sound! If the currents in each of the bifilar pair are balanced - that is they are equal magnitude and opposite phase - there will be no net flux in the core. If they
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00231.html (11,878 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: Jim GM <jim.gmforum@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:30:09 -0500
I have an AS-50-L1 unu;n balun from Array Solutions. Does not matter where I place it problem still exists. -- Jim K9TF _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@cont
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00232.html (9,559 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:55:24 -0400
I typically place a 1:1 choke transformer at the feed point of my dipole or vertical ground plane, and run coax to a remote relay switch out in the yard, with a single coax to the shack. Am I placing
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00234.html (9,426 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:19:43 -0400
Jim Brown also has a nice exegesis on the use of toroids which will keep you busy for a while: http://www.audiosystemsgroup.com/RFI-Ham.pdf -- K8JHR -- Steve (G3TXQ) has a nice chart showing impedanc
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00235.html (10,393 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:54:58 -0700
It's not clear to me what sort of choke you are imagining, but it is trivially easy to build a VERY effective common mode choke by first taping together a pair of insulated conductors to form a paral
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00248.html (10,893 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 22:47:36 +0200
Jim, Thanks for the details. I have noted your suggestion for future use. I'm not sure what THHN wire is, but I will google it. I'm sure we have it here, but under a different name. You said ordinary
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00252.html (13,307 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu