Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+CB\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] 27m (score: 1)
Author: Bob McGraw K4TAX <rmcgraw@blomand.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 12:39:00 -0500
That topic has data collected by the FCC. I feel sorry for those folks in the 7200 FCC snare. Bob, K4TAX Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec
/archives//html/TenTec/2019-11/msg00011.html (10,242 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] off frequency omni VI+ (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <kenradiobrown@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 12:09:58 -1000
Hi all, Bob said "Most ham radios are reasonably accurate but resolving less than 100 Hz is based on many variables and assumptions. Even the number of digits in the software calculations are truncat
/archives//html/TenTec/2019-11/msg00016.html (13,662 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] CB (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ny6p01@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 19:57:35 -0700
I think we should give those frequencies to the Amateur service at this point. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
/archives//html/TenTec/2019-11/msg00017.html (8,824 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] CB (score: 1)
Author: John Fleming <john@w3gqj.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 23:08:14 -0400
When I got my license in 1956, we had the 11 meter band and when the sun spot cycle peaked in 1958, conversation with England was normal. 73, John Fat fingered from my 6th Generation iPad ___________
/archives//html/TenTec/2019-11/msg00018.html (9,226 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu