- 21. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:33:16 -0400
- Your quite welcome John. BUT...I wish I could encourage you to take a stab at QRQ. It is such a blast to have QSO's at high speed's and once you do it, you really do get kinda hooked on it! my frust
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00882.html (10,441 bytes)
- 22. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:59:41 -0400
- Sorry folks...got caught by the 'Reply' thing again. Even though I changed the send-to address, it still came to the reflector. I would like to end the thread on QRQ CW on the reflector, but would be
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00883.html (12,029 bytes)
- 23. [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
- Author: john.brewer@us.schneider-electric.com
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:17:17 -0400
- So they didn't allow the Israeli version of the FCC to abdicate their responsibility as did the US FCC? What a refreshing attitude! John _______________________________________________ TenTec mailin
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00342.html (6,898 bytes)
- 24. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
- Author: "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm@mendelson.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:25:50 +0300
- On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 01:17:17PM -0400, john.brewer@us.schneider-electric.com wrote: Good attitude lousy implementation. Tests are given TWICE a year. They will give the test in English if more tha
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00353.html (7,608 bytes)
- 25. [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
- Author: "Lew" <Ljl160@verizon.net>
- Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:29:04 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
- I'm very sorry to see the "no" code rule but-if anyone has a Begali or WBL paddle they will no longer need- let me know? It will get very good use here HI!!!!!!! 73-Lew K1NDV ________________________
- /archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00320.html (6,568 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu