Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+CW\s+Filters\s+\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+CW\s+Filters\s+\?\?\?\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 14:53:02 -0400; I am learning the Code and will soon try CW mode. I shall commence with casual contacts, but eventually want to work CW contests with the big boys at the contest station, with whom I now work phone c; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00144.html (7,211 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 21:03:04 +0200; James, My experience as a casual CW operator but avid CW contester is, on normal days, especially during the week, the DSP filters are enough even without the roofing filter. On contest weekends, it; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00146.html (9,580 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 15:21:33 -0400; there's quite a jump from "learning the code" to operating the CW contests with the big boys. I'm for saving the money and just using the dsp filters. When you're copying 40+ WPM and keep yelling out; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00147.html (8,457 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: k3miy@csonline.net; Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 15:58:56 -0400; James Three hundred hertz filter ought to do it. Ron K3MIY -- This mail sent through CSOnline Webmail http://webmail.csonline.net _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list T; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00148.html (9,008 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: k3miy@csonline.net; Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 16:03:14 -0400; Mike I'm still learning the code :-), and I never use dupe sheets; I memorize the fists like they did in WWII. Lotsa fun! Ron K3MIY -- This mail sent through CSOnline Webmail http://webmail.csonline.; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00149.html (9,378 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: "John T. Fleming" <john@w3gqj.net>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 15:31:40 -0400; Richard, For years I did not have a radio that had filters in it. I remember building a Q-multiplier for my SX-99. But I was gifted with perfect pitch. As such I learned to concentrate on the pitch o; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00150.html (9,395 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py2@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 15:45:32 -0400; I'm going to go against the grain here and say just buy the 500 hertz filter. The 500 hertz filter adds badly needed skirts to the DSP filters. I find I almost always use 500 hertz on CW as the filte; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00151.html (8,839 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 22:05:37 +0200; There you go James, as I predicted, you have now received all possible answers. As I said, it is a matter of taste. We all have different preferences. Perhaps Carl has the best suggestion for a begin; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00152.html (10,675 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 16:11:26 -0400; Lots of contests still require a dupe sheet.... mike _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00153.html (8,453 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 20:24:19 +0000; The vast majority of the time, DSP filtering is sufficient. You need the analog filter when there's very strong signals outside of the dsp filter passband, strong enough that the analog to digital co; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00154.html (12,055 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 18:37:09 -0500; Buy both. They really make the radio perform much better when operating narrow band modes such as CW, PSK-31 and etc. I've had both installed in my Omni VII since day one. 73 Bob, K4TAX _____________; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00155.html (9,204 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 19:44:16 -0500; Great! CW is a fun mode. While filters are expensive, if you have the ability, buy both. Having them will give you the opportunity to learn just how to use them to dig signals out of tough conditions; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00156.html (9,348 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 18:14:54 -0700; If money is no problem, buy both, considering your plan to be a big-gun contester. I have the 600-Hz and 300-Hz filters in my Eagle. In my Omni-VI Plus I had 500-Hz and 250-Hz filters in each of the; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00157.html (9,040 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 07:53:20 +0200; Barry, as I understand it, the 300 Hz filter doesn't kick in until the DSP is tuned to 300Hz, so effectively its only active when you are down to 300 Hz anyway. Just an idea, but maybe you could plug; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00161.html (14,101 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 01:58:52 -0400; -- Nope... you have an unfortunate honest streak that would preclude you from ever winning the election. -- K8JHR -- ,,/ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@con; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00163.html (9,069 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:21:24 +0000; Yes, that's exactly what you do - install the 300hz filter as if it's a 500hz filter, and it kicks in when dsp selectivity is set to 500hz. I'm willing to bet that the combination of 300hz filter and; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00165.html (9,596 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 12:35:04 +0200; I won't take you up on that Barry, because you would win! Remember what we did with the original Orion (1)? We inserted a 600 Hz INRAD roofing filter in place of the 1kHz filter, and it worked just f; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00166.html (10,458 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: "Martin Sole" <hs0zed@csloxinfo.com>; Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 17:40:06 +0700; Does it make a difference on the Orion 565 which slot you plug a filter in? I mean you can fix the crystal filter in the menu so you could have any fitted filter in all the time if you wanted. I gues; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00167.html (11,326 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 13:07:59 +0200; Martin, If you are referring to my comment about the 600Hz INRAD filter, then yes, it makes a BIG difference. I MUST go in the first bank of filters; it cannot be used in place of one of the CW filte; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00169.html (12,690 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 11:28:45 +0000; You want to avoid the 250/500hz slots in the Orion because of the extra preamp stage and measurably higher IMD. That's why many of us in the know use the 1000hz slot for our narrow Orion cw roofing f; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00170.html (13,200 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]