Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+CW\s+Key\s+Clicks\s+and\s+Filters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+CW\s+Key\s+Clicks\s+and\s+Filters\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:01:05 -0500; What is a 579? All I ever hear is 599. Also, better add 579p for pish pa. And 579tn for "TenTecs never do it". Steve Ellington N4LQ. -- Original Message -- From: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <N4NT@charter.net; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00553.html (10,678 bytes)
2. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: ah7i@atl.org (Bob); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:12:39 -0500; RST, T is for tone. 10 whole descriptors already. (0-9) although I've never been able to read a 0X0 signal well enough to respond :-O; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00558.html (8,712 bytes)
3. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: AC5E@aol.com (AC5E@aol.com); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:16:33 EST; Well, practically speaking, even a "pure carrier" takes up at least some spectrum. We used to say, by rule of thumb, that CW occupies 2 times the keying speed. 40 cycles, Hz, for 20 WPM, etc.. Most o; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00554.html (8,357 bytes)
4. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:07:54 -0500; I must agree with Tom. Those DSP-only reveivers tend to emphasize key clicks for some reason. This has been mentioned in QST reviews of at least one radio. Steve Ellington N4LQ. -- Original Message -; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00518.html (15,066 bytes)
5. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:52:43 -0500; power Wouldn't that report be given as a "591?" I recall that a "1" on the RST's "T" scale meant raw AC. -Paul, W9AC; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00552.html (8,670 bytes)
6. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: jmalloy@stny.rr.com (Joe Malloy); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:35:16 -0500; Now, this is a suggestion worthy of The Old Man himself (especially the last one!). I'd add for historical accuracy the report "599ac" for "you need a DC power supply". 73, Joe, W2RBA; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00551.html (9,013 bytes)
7. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: CAlderma@ora.fda.gov (Alderman, Chester); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 07:50:46 -0500; Since I am obviously technically deficient, would someone mind explaining to me what a 'keying artifact' is and what a 'spectrum artifact' is? I just don't understand those terms and need some help.; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00550.html (10,550 bytes)
8. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: N4NT@charter.net (Mike Hyder -N4NT-); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 07:30:34 -0500; Maybe we need new suffixes: 579c for chirps 579k for clicks 579h for hash 579s for secondary carrier 579gg for general garbage on your signal, OM 579ih indescribably horrible signal Mike do all And o; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00548.html (10,078 bytes)
9. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: AC5E@aol.com (AC5E@aol.com); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 07:10:19 EST; Yes, the RST system does use the c for chirp and k for key clicks. And I do use those when the occasion warrents. But the system does not provide for what to me is the most annoying keying artifact o; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00547.html (9,492 bytes)
10. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: N4LQ@igLou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 06:18:39 -0000; I have QSOed K8-- twice who runs an SGC 2020. It has a strong spur 630hz down from the carrier. I could tune down and copy his spur S9. I've tried twice to get this across to him but it falls on deaf; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00545.html (13,364 bytes)
11. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com); Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 21:36:12 -0500; The RST system provided for chirps and clicks........ Example: 579c was for chirps 579k was for klix..... Anyone use this anymore? Are you afraid to be truthful? :-) Perry w8au; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00546.html (8,907 bytes)
12. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: N4LQ@igLou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 22:42:58 -0000; I've had several DSP receivers...Fist the Pegasus then TS-870 and TS-2000. I believe QST mentioned key clicks in the receiver of the IC-756pro. Their comment was something like....We noticed key clic; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00521.html (11,112 bytes)
13. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:36:40 -0600; I need to dig out the results of some studies I made about a year ago that clearly demonstrated that most of the keying artifacts that we object to result from the manner by which the leading and tra; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00537.html (16,226 bytes)
14. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: N4NT@charter.net (Mike Hyder -N4NT-); Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 17:26:56 -0500; Wonder if any noise might be generated by the transmitter's coming up before some loop is locked? Talked with a friend who was running a SGC rig. It was interesting in that the feeling I got was that; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00536.html (11,572 bytes)
15. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:00:38 -0800 (PST); The rampant clicks I am referring to are +/- 500-800hz from the fundamental and clearly audible with a xtal filtered receiver. They are not the artifact of the receiver, they are present in the xmit; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00535.html (11,230 bytes)
16. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:55:56 -1000; Aloha, Thanks for all the comments, on the list and direct. Certainly seems to be an area for some disagreements on the reality and/or source of the "heard" clicks, hi. Will be interesting to hear of; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00533.html (8,262 bytes)
17. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: N4NT@charter.net (Mike Hyder -N4NT-); Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:06:51 -0500; If, using an ole timey receiver with no DSP stuff, I notch out the audio note of the received CW signal, I can then better hear all sorts of artifacts if they are there. Often I can hear the artifact; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00526.html (14,419 bytes)
18. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: ascanand@harris.com (Scanandoah, Alan); Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 11:28:23 -0500; Listening with an AGC-free direct conversion receiver while throttling the RF gain back would be a good starting point; they tend to add significantly less "color" to received signals than the superh; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00523.html (9,747 bytes)
19. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: CAlderma@ora.fda.gov (Alderman, Chester); Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 11:03:29 -0500; In addition, you normally can not determine if a transmitted CW signal has clicks by listening to it with a receiver!! If you really want to know if a CW signal has key clicks, you must observe the t; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00522.html (12,715 bytes)
20. [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 06:57:29 -0800 (PST); W8JI deserves a lot of credit for drawing attention to this serious problem. Clicks are a function of the rise and fall time of the trasmitted waveform, and should therefore be independent of keying; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00520.html (8,825 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]