Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+CW\s+weighting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+CW\s+weighting\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] CW weighting (score: 1): Author: Charles Harpole <k4vud@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 03:26:19 +0000; I hate CW weighting other than the standard. Some folks think off-standard gets them noticed. It does by me.... to avoid that signal at all costs! Charles Harpole, HS0ZCW k4vud@hotmail.com __________; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00244.html (10,937 bytes)
2. [TenTec] CW weighting (score: 1): Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:00:54 -0700 (PDT); I had thought that the Omni 6 Plus time duration of the "Di" was too short when set to 1.0. My old AEA keyer sounded nice, I liked it. I had used a straight key for 10 years before I got the AEA keye; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00253.html (7,007 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] CW weighting (score: 1): Author: "Lyle Dunlap" <qskqrq@grics.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:58:39 -0500; Depends on your speed, if your a dit dah operator 50% or as you say standard is ok. But if you run some speed you better lighten up. Lyle W9FCX _______________________________________________ TenTec; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00257.html (9,387 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] CW weighting (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:21:25 -0400; I find non-standard weighting not nearly as easy to copy - a different accent as it were. Analogy: These Indians who seem to infest call centers may be fluent in English but I might understand one wo; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00261.html (12,290 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] CW weighting (score: 1): Author: Tim Randa <tranda@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:04:59 -0500; I think bug use would be considered non standard weighting but I find it delightful to listen to from a good operator Tim KØFL _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenT; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00266.html (13,484 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] CW weighting (score: 1): Author: Marinus Loewensteijn <zl2ml@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 06:17:57 +0800; What a lot of folks do not realise is that with modern DSP processing the CW get's "muddled" and characters get shortened. This is especially noticeable if you are using an external DSP processor, th; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00287.html (7,415 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] CW weighting (score: 1): Author: "Lyle Dunlap" <qskqrq@grics.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:01:13 -0500; Good point Marinus, I had occasion one time to need Keying Compensation on a new digital rig. Not to be confused with Keying Delay or Weighting, I ended up with the MFJ 495 which is a great keyer. Ma; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00299.html (9,118 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]