Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Centurion\s+rating\s+in\s+Eham\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Centurion\s+rating\s+in\s+Eham\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Centurion rating in Eham (score: 1): Author: k5uj@hotmail.com (Rob Atkinson, K5UJ); Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 20:12:33 +0000; Not sure how big a deal this is: on the Eham web page that lists all of the HF amps, there is this line for the Centurion: Ten Tec Centurion 21 4.0 6/26/02 If you go through all of the Centurion revi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00331.html (6,976 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Centurion rating in Eham (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 23:24:21 -0400; Forget it. They couldn't be bothered to apologize to one of their (now former) advertisers for giving said advertiser a lousy review due to an unpaid bill (which was unpaid because they never sent it; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00338.html (7,885 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]