- 1. [TenTec] Colliins SWR Bridge (score: 1)
- Author: ac9s@mchsi.com
- Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:26:50 -0600 (CST)
- Jerry, You wrote: "Many a ham SWR meter is a very rough approximation of SWR and even when it shows matched, the impedance and reactance may be a ways from 50 ohms resistive. Birds aren't bad, Collin
- /archives//html/TenTec/2009-12/msg00101.html (7,027 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] Colliins SWR Bridge (score: 1)
- Author: "geraldj" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
- Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 01:15:58 -0600
- Yes. 73, Jerry, K0CQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
- /archives//html/TenTec/2009-12/msg00102.html (7,793 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] Colliins SWR Bridge (score: 1)
- Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:42:59 -0500
- the science of a simple device mirrors the more complex. In other words, rocket science is not needed. For years I used a cheap CB matchbox on 10 meters in series with a Bird 43 wattmeter, just for
- /archives//html/TenTec/2009-12/msg00103.html (9,235 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] Colliins SWR Bridge (score: 1)
- Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>
- Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:40:19 -0600
- The problems are that without good directivity, that null may not actually be a match. Poor directivity couples forward power to the reverse power indicator and while there is always a null indicatio
- /archives//html/TenTec/2009-12/msg00105.html (9,248 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] Colliins SWR Bridge (score: 1)
- Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:44:55 -0500
- Yes Jerry, I did reverse the two but the result was the same. Note that I used RG-213 between the two and RG-58 on either side. I tried different lengths of RG-213 from 12in to 45in without much diff
- /archives//html/TenTec/2009-12/msg00107.html (10,454 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu