Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Comparison\s+Orion\s+vs\s+TS850\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Comparison\s+Orion\s+vs\s+TS850\s+\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Comparison Orion vs TS850 ? (score: 1): Author: Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de>; Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 21:57:37 +0100; Hello, I actually think about replacing one of my two TS850s by an Orion. Unfortunately, I had no chance to find an ORION owner here in the southwestern corner of Germany, resulting in no possiblity; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00789.html (8,625 bytes)
2. RE: [TenTec] Comparison Orion vs TS850 ? (score: 1): Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 22:37:54 +0100; Ulrich, I can answer some of the questions - though sorry, I have not had a chance to compare the 850 to the Orion. I have only compared it to an ICOM IC-746 and an Elecraft K2. The ORION has provisi; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00790.html (10,778 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Comparison Orion vs TS850 ? (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 21:44:26 -0000; I am running an Orion with the ACOM 1000. With TxOut connected to the ACOM key in, and the ACOM key out connected back to TxEn of the Orion, QSK is perfect with the AMP. The Orion interfaces perfectl; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00791.html (9,814 bytes)
4. RE: [TenTec] Comparison Orion vs TS850 ? (score: 1): Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 16:54:04 -0500; If you look at the QST reviews, you will see the 850 receiver beats the Orion in a couple of areas at 20khz spacing. I think you safely say, however, at 10 khz spacing or less the Orion ought to beat; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00792.html (9,671 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]