Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Comparisons\s+to\s+the\s+Elecraft\s+K2\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Comparisons to the Elecraft K2 (score: 1)
Author: emery@nas.nasa.gov (Scott Emery)
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 15:01:07 -0800
The Elecraft K2 web page has a charge which shows the K2 as having "better" receive (on the QST benchmarks) than most (or all) TenTec Equipment. I realize that the rigs are aimed at different markets
/archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00158.html (7,435 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Comparisons to the Elecraft K2 (score: 1)
Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (John - G3JAG)
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 01:51:54 -0000 (GMT)
I have a K2 which I run alongside an Omni-V. They are very different animals. The K2 is a full-featured, low powered (nominally only 10w) radio with extremely good performance; SSB is an add-on optio
/archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00163.html (10,177 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Comparisons to the Elecraft K2 (score: 1)
Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.)
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 21:27:12 -0600
The 10 watts of the K2 should drive your linear to 100 watts, IF it is truly linear. That's as good as the barefoot Omni. 73, Jerry, K0CQ -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submis
/archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00165.html (7,060 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu