Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Correction\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Correction\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: w6ru@bak.rr.com (Terry Gaiser); Date: Tue Mar 25 23:05:07 2003; Spell checker did not like my use of "sees" and I mistakenly took it's first suggested replacement .... "sea's" ... sorry about that. Terry W6RU; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00870.html (6,135 bytes)
2. [TenTec] correction (score: 1): Author: ki5jb@yahoo.com (Dan Pearson); Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 18:46:13 -0700 (PDT); hi agn folks: oops my message should have read 1.8kc and 0.5kc filters, forgive me 73 dan ki5jb@yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at ht; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00030.html (6,710 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: sales@tentec.com (Ten-Tec, Inc.); Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 13:02:38 Eastern Daylight Time; The price of the 560 Corsair listed by us earlier today should have been $575, not $500. Thanks. 73, Scott Robbins, W4PA Amateur Radio Sales, Ten-Tec, Inc. -- Ten-Tec, Inc., 1185 Dolly Parton Pkwy.,; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-05/msg00139.html (7,228 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: John King <k5pgw@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:16:50 -0800 (PST); My post should have read" I have a 7 mhz Scout MODULE for swap or sale". Please note the correction and accept my appologies. Thanks and 73, John, K5PGW __________________________________ Do you Yaho; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00352.html (6,483 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: "Keith Hamilton" <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 18:28:51 -0400; I made a typo in my question. I meant to say I must tune the radio from 7.040.00 to 7.040.20 to center the 250 hz filter. Sorry Keith W8GX _______________________________________________ TenTec maili; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00019.html (7,296 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py2@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 18:33:17 -0400; The real question is is the filter 200 hertz off or is your impression of the same tone 200 hertz off. Only the 250 filter would be narrow enough for this to show up. You need a second radio to see i; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00020.html (8,141 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 18:51:00 -0400; I am a piano tuner by profession. My tonal impression could never be as much as 200hertz off. The filter is 200 hz off. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@cont; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00021.html (8,977 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 18:56:07 -0400; If I switch from the 500 hz filter to the 250 hz filter the tone heard in the speaker does NOT change. Just the signal strength changes. To bring the signal strength back up I must tune up the band.; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00022.html (7,579 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 17:50:40 -1000; Hi Keith, There are three things which determine the audio frequency of the CW note you hear when listening to a CW signal with an Omni VI. Those three things are: 1) The RF frequency of the signal y; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00025.html (10,188 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: "CSM$r$ Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 23:16:48 -0500; Or you could just re-read closely the Ten-Tec owner's manual and note the recommendation to move the PBT to either 11 or 1 o'clock depending upon the band you are using and the sideband the CW is off; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00027.html (11,473 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 00:40:04 -0400; Thank you for your input and expertise Gary but I still don't see how the PBT setting would be correct for one filter (500 hz filter - PBT control at either 11 or 1 o'clock depending on the band) and; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00028.html (13,144 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 00:52:58 -0400; Actually I am trying to reconcile the differences between the center frequency of the 500 Hz filter and the 250 Hz filter, both in the 6.3 mHz PB IF. The center frequencies should be the same -( 6.29; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00029.html (12,525 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: geoffrey mendelson <geoffreymendelson@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 08:02:35 +0300; Do you have an RTTY (as opposed to CW) filter? Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, N3OWJ/4X1GM Making your enemy reliant on software you support is the best revenge. ____________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00030.html (9,400 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 01:14:47 -0400; Actually I wondered that myself Geoff. The filter is stamped "282" and "48054" on the top of the crystals. Keith W8GX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contes; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00031.html (10,296 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: geoffrey mendelson <geoffreymendelson@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 08:27:31 +0300; Here's a web page with pictures and specs, it looks to me that you have a defective filter: <http://www.al7fs.us/282-285.html> Found by searching for "ten tec 282 filter". Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mende; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00032.html (8,761 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 21:52:48 -1000; Yes it would be much nicer if all of your 6.3 MHz IF filters had the same center frequency. It sounds like you have determined that they do not. So then when switching between filters you will need; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00033.html (10,089 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: "CSM$r$ Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 07:48:12 -0500; And that can be part of the problem, you do have to know which CW filter you have in the 250 HZ Position? There are two that will work, the 219 and the 221. "What's the difference between the 219 an; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00034.html (15,109 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 10:18:42 -0400; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00035.html (16,700 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: "Keith Hamilton" <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 14:09:48 -0400; Gary - You were right! Turning the PBT to 11 o'clock solved it. Keith W8GX Or you could just re-read closely the Ten-Tec owner's manual and note the recommendation to move the PBT to either 11 or 1 o; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00037.html (12,555 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]