Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Corsair\s+II\s+AGC\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Corsair\s+II\s+AGC\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Corsair II AGC (score: 1): Author: David Reynolds" <k6wrf@gotnet.net (David Reynolds); Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 08:48:28 -0700; I have a Corsair II that I have had for many years and the only thing I would like to change is the slow AGC.Does anyone know if there is a mod to do it...Any help would be appreciated... tnx es 73 D; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00711.html (6,672 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Corsair II AGC (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:11:27 -0700 (PDT); K6WRF asks: "I have a Corsair II that I have had for many years and the only thing I would like to change is the slow AGC.Does anyone know if there is a mod to do it" IMHO, the hang AGC action is the; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00715.html (7,242 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Corsair II AGC (score: 1): Author: mandolinist@interlync.com (Gary Smith); Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:08:35 -0500; I do somewhat the same; I use either the old timewave 59+ or my Autek QF-1A with the AGC shut off. I guarantee that old piece of antiquity; QF-1A is perfect for 99.99% of what's out there with my Cor; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00729.html (7,841 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Corsair II AGC (score: 1): Author: W6RU@aol.com (W6RU@aol.com); Date: Sun, 5 Jul 1998 01:07:56 EDT; Anyone come up with a fix for the loud pop on the attack of the AGC in this rig. I really like this radio but this pop is driving me to maybe get rid of the radio. Seems like it is worse on this radi; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00034.html (7,749 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Corsair II AGC (score: 1): Author: cooper@gmpvt.com (Tom Cooper); Date: Mon, 06 Jul 1998 10:09:00 -0400; I am also searching for a magic bullet. The pop really is the only bad thing I can think of about my CSII. I replaced the agc and hang electrolytic charge caps with tantalum and it improves it some.; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00040.html (8,929 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Corsair II AGC (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Mon, 06 Jul 1998 14:12:36 -0400; This won't help much right now, but I'll keep digging. Some years ago (10?), there was a capacitor change near the audio output amplifier, maybe it was near the QSK transistor that shut off the audio; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00045.html (10,391 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Corsair II AGC (score: 1): Author: cooper@gmpvt.com (Tom Cooper); Date: Tue, 07 Jul 1998 10:33:45 -0400; Several people asked for more info on the W3TS RF-derived AGC circuit. I haven't had time to find the schematic he sent me, but I will post it as soon as I can. Tom W1EAT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.co; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00057.html (7,678 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Corsair II AGC (score: 1): Author: cooper@gmpvt.com (Tom Cooper); Date: Wed, 08 Jul 1998 10:07:55 -0400; Walt (and others), I have a copy of a copy of a copy of the Ron Lee modification for the Omni-A,-D schematic and it is almost the same what T-T used in the Corsair II. A diode limiter followed by an; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00065.html (8,005 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Corsair II AGC (score: 1): Author: talljazz@teleport.com (Dan Presley); Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 12:12:18 +0100; Hmm-I don't think I have this problem on my 'II. I do a lot of weak signal/qrp cw work, and haven't noticed this as a problem; maybe I'm immune to it! Can you give a better description, or is it only; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00066.html (7,747 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Corsair II AGC (score: 1): Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com); Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 15:56:31 EDT; Dan, I agree, when I had the Corsair II, I found the AGC to be incredibly smooth. Every bit as good as the Omni VI. Paul -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@con; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00068.html (7,585 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Corsair II AGC (score: 1): Author: cooper@gmpvt.com (Tom Cooper); Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 10:57:16 -0400; I've gotten messages from several people saying that their CSII didn't "pop" on strong signals, which makes me wonder if there was a production mod or maybe some other explaination. The schematic sho; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00075.html (8,260 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Corsair II AGC (score: 1): Author: peter barville <peter@barville.nospam.demon.co.uk> (peter barville); Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 00:30:13 +0100; Nor me! -- For up to date information on QRP Dx operations, and QRP contests: http://www.barville.demon.co.uk/qrpinfo.htm 72, peter g3xjs Please remove "nospam" when replying. ie "peter@barville.demo; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00079.html (8,072 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Corsair II AGC (score: 1): Author: cooper@gmpvt.com (Tom Cooper); Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 14:37:40 -0400; I went home at lunch and looked through some of the various piles of ham radio related paper that have made my desk and workbench their home, and found some stuff I didn't know I had relating to Cors; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00084.html (8,710 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Corsair II AGC (score: 1): Author: "Paul DeWitte K9OT" <k9ot@mhtc.net>; Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:19:28 -0600; Last weekend I used my Corsair II in the 160m contest. It is much quieter on rcv than my Omni VI+, and will hear anything that the Omni VI+ will. I did have some front end overload or AGC pumping fro; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00149.html (7,484 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II AGC (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:46:13 -0600; I'm pretty sure the AGC in the Corsair II is derived from audio after the detector, and so after all the crystal filters but before the audio filter. So that has to be where the AGC pumping came from; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00150.html (8,075 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II AGC (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 17:37:01 -0800 (PST); I suppose if you don't mind losing the SSB capability of the Corsair you could substitute the 2.4kHz wide 1st IF filter with either the 217 (500hz) or 219 (250hz) 9MHz filter. Would not likely do muc; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00157.html (8,282 bytes)
17. [TenTec] Corsair II AGC (score: 1): Author: scottsheppard@videotron.ca; Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:53:48 -0500; I know this has been discussed at some length--and by the looks of my corsair II several mods have been made--including a 16v 1000uF electrolytic capacitor across one of the connector pins. I can act; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00326.html (7,204 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II AGC (score: 1): Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:56:09 +0000; You might try experimenting with the value of R46 - it determines how fast the agc will track a varying signal. If it's a very high value, or is removed entirely, the agc couldn't track a varying sig; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00330.html (8,785 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]