Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Corsair\s+II\s+noise\s+blanker\s*$/: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:03:30 -0700
Of my two Corsair II's, one has a NB board p/n 80977, which correspond to the NB called out in the manual. The other Corsair II has a NB board p/n 81401, for which I've not been able to find any docu
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00239.html (7,088 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 09:01:52 -0400 (EDT)
Have you confirmed that the newer board is a completely different design from your old board ? Are the components different ? I have an Argonaut 505 and the power amp board is a different number from
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00243.html (9,184 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 09:43:27 -0700
Yes, the circuitry is different. The 81401 IC complement is 2-MC1350P's and 1-LM358N, and it has 6 transistors and 3 diodes. Interface to the NB level and NB width pots (connectors #7 and 22 respecti
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00246.html (10,719 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 22:07:29 -0400
Do any of these TT noise blankers do anything for you guys. Mine appears to do very little in my Omni VI Plus... Best regards - Bry Carling _______________________________________________ TenTec mail
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00247.html (8,863 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edwards <kd2e@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 22:32:34 -0400
The only noise blanker I ever found to help things was the one on the Drake R4C. ....Dave Best regards - Bry Carling Of my two Corsair II's, one has a NB board p/n 80977, which correspond to the NB c
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00248.html (8,962 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Kuehl <qrp_op@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 20:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
Brian, I used an Omni V and then an Omni VI+ for years, but never found their noise blankers to be very useful. I no longer have them and I am back to my original Corsair II. If I turn the noise blan
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00249.html (8,331 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 07:46:41 -0400 (EDT)
The best noise blanker I've ever heard was in the Triton 544. It really works very well . Why anyone would change a good design is a mystery. Doug WD4LNW Sent from AOL Mobile Mail <div id="AOLMsgPart
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00250.html (11,603 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 06:59:41 -0500
The hardware optional NB for the Eagle does eliminate the pulse ignition/injector noise in my truck mobile and it does not punch holes in the audio. 73 Bob, K4TAX The only noise blanker I ever found
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00251.html (10,725 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 07:23:09 -0700
I agree. The NB on the Triton's completely eliminates my S9+ powerline noise, but neither the Corsair or OMNI V NB's are effective dealing with that noise. I too have wondered why the Triton NB desig
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00252.html (14,646 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:31:08 +0100
* Why anyone would change a good design is a mystery. * The requirements changed. When the Triton was designed, about the only need for a noise blanker was for ignition noise. The noise blanker was o
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00253.html (9,745 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: Bill Cotter <n4lg@qx.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:34:54 -0400
The NB in my OMNI-VI+ and Corsair-II work great to eliminate electric fence noise and lightning bursts. 73 Bill N4LG Best regards - Bry Carling correspond to the NB called out in the manual. The othe
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00254.html (10,068 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 10:48:38 -0500
And to this end, there are many different types of pulse noise. Some pulse noise is repetitive, meaning the timing interval between pulses is equal, and some is non repetitive which means the pulses
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00255.html (12,589 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:22:37 +0100
The problem is with radios that have a DSP-AGC. The Omni VI+ and Corsair-II do not have DSP-based AGC. The problem is with almost every transceiver currently on the market, except those I listed prev
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00256.html (12,022 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:01:00 -0400 (EDT)
Good explanation ! Maybe they should have had several different stages built into the NB for different applications. They probably did just that. My Triton still works very well for most noise proble
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00257.html (10,837 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:35:29 -0400
Do NB circuits have differing impact/utility/effect on CW vs SSB vs data signals? -- K8JHR -- ___________________________________________________ / _______________________________________________ Ten
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00258.html (9,177 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 20:11:18 -0500
Not really. Or I would hope not. To some extent, SSB voice can be viewed as short pulses at random intervals and CW is very long pulses at long to moderate intervals. When one examines noise we find
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00259.html (12,029 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:15:18 -1000
There are many kinds of noise blankers. They differ in the way they decide when to blank the signal (their triggering source), where in the signal path they perform the blanking, and the timing of th
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00260.html (10,556 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 00:22:06 -0400
Ken and Bob - Man... thanks - exactly the sort of explanation I wish they would put in user manuals for guys like me who are not radio engineers. Sidebar -- There is an on-going debate on a Brand X r
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00261.html (10,537 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 09:04:19 +0100
Actually Elecraft K3 allows you to choose between traditional NB and short pulse NB. So, depending on what it is you are trying to eliminate, you choose whichever NB mode is better. 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00262.html (9,356 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder - W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 12:15:33 -0400
I like the NR in the Omni VII much better than the one in the Eagle. The audio characteristics in the Eagle change dramatically in SSB and AM modes. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Plea
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00263.html (11,045 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu