Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Corsair\s+II\s+noise\s+blanker\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Corsair\s+II\s+noise\s+blanker\s*$/: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 20:02:49 +0100; Correct, but the topic was NB, not NR. The Eagle's NB is better than the OM7's. The reverse is true for NR. 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) I like the NR in the Omni VII much better than the; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00265.html (11,976 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1): Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 15:39:34 -0400; The noise blanker is the Ten Tec Scout is excellent. It is a simple circuit which should be easy to duplicate. 73, Bob WB2VUF 73 Bob, K4TAX The only noise blanker I ever found to help things was the; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00266.html (12,265 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 11:18:51 -1000; Yes Noise Blankers and Noise Reduction devices are quite different. I'm not sure exactly how Noise Reduction systems work, but I'm pretty sure they not not completely blank the whole signal. Noise Bl; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00267.html (9,996 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1): Author: "paulpolace" <wn8qhf@wowway.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 18:34:45 -0400; Correct Rick! The topic is NB... NOT... NR. Hard to believe or understand... yet my Century-22 actually handles noise better than the Omni VII, and were going way back. Could the variable 8-pole band; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00268.html (12,652 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 00:21:36 +0100; Are you referring to the LC BPF's in the front end? I never saw a Century but if it has the elevator like the Argonauts and Tritons had in those days, then yes, in general it did help reduce overall; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00269.html (14,688 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1): Author: "R. Eric Sluder - W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:21:58 -0400; I was responding to James comments on personal preference for NR & NB. Eric W9WLW -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _____________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00270.html (13,705 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1): Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 16:37:16 -0700; With my particular noise source (powerline), the TRITON NB removes the noise without having to fuss with anything, and at least I cannot detect any compromise of audio quality. The ANC-4 that I use f; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00272.html (11,786 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1): Author: "paulpolace" <wn8qhf@wowway.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 23:37:00 -0400; Rick, Actually was only a variable 8 pole "audio" bandpass filter, but somehow produces some fantastic results in relation to noise as well. There was always talk that the C-22 incorporated the "Jone; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00274.html (15,928 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 12:37:44 +0200; As I recall, the Century series were direct conversion receivers. Those don't fare well on 40m here in EU and 40m is my favorite band. Of course the modern SDR radios are also direct conversion but t; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00275.html (17,959 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 07:34:31 -1000; The ANC-4 is not a noise blanker, and it is also not a DSP noise reduction device. As it's model number suggests it is a "noise canceller." What it really does is use an additional antenna and some p; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00277.html (10,734 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1): Author: "paulpolace" <wn8qhf@wowway.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 14:42:28 -0400; Correct again, the C-22 is a DC.(receives a CW sig on both sides) I guess not good for your QTH for specific reasons as referenced! I am sure it's vintage is not even in the same ballpark with the pr; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00278.html (18,131 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 07:12:28 +0200; Hi ??? (sorry, somehow I missed your name), Actually the talk of the "Jones Filter" may not be as far-fetched as you think. In the early days of Ten-Tec, Lee Jones was the chief technology officer. G; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00279.html (19,463 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1): Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 22:08:08 -0400; I've noticed that, too. The simple audio filter in my Century 22 does an amazing job of filtering out noise (mainly a buzz from switching power supplies and plasma TVs in the neighborhood). Also, it; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00283.html (18,012 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1): Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 22:10:45 -0400; Strange - mine in the OMNI VI+ does NOTHING to either of these types of noises no matter how you adjust the radio. I'll have whatever Bill is having... _______________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00284.html (11,134 bytes)
35. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:18:25 -0500; Some of the older radios used a circuit best described as a noise limiter. In effect it was a diode clipping system and yes it did add a good bit of distortion to the signal. I find that with today's; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00285.html (19,261 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 35
Page: [1] [2]