Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Corsair\s+II\s+vs\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Corsair\s+II\s+vs\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Corsair II vs Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: "Paul DeWitte K9OT" <k9ot@mhtc.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 18:38:17 -0000; I have been playing the last couple of days (nights) on 80&160m listening on both the Corsair II and my Omni VI+. I can switch back and forth between either radio using the same ant, so I can compare; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00359.html (7,424 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II vs Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <mike.hyder.n4nt@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:45:50 -0500; If you'll get an Omni-C or a Triton 544, you may like listening to either of them better than the Corsair II or the Omni IV+. 73, Mike N4NT I have been playing the last couple of days (nights) on 80&; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00365.html (8,566 bytes)
3. RE: [TenTec] Corsair II vs Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:49:26 -0800; Paul, It's been a very long time since I had a Corsair II, but I did have an Omni VI+ at the same time. Indeed the Corsair II (probably the Corsair I as well, but I never had one) is a very quiet rec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00366.html (9,152 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II vs Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: OTAKEBI@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 18:49:08 EST; The Corsair II is the best radio that TT made. If you can't hear it with the Corsair II it is not there. Add an outboard DSP filter and an equalizer for the mike and it can't be surpassed. Have not u; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00377.html (7,495 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II vs Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 06:40:55 -0600; Paul, I've done the same "test" with my OMNI VI+ and Corsair II but also tried the major CW pile-ups 1-2 KHz from a weak DX station. It seemed to me (just earballing) that there were less Sum and Dif; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00453.html (10,878 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II vs Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 23:19:57 -1000; When the DSP noise reduction is not being used, the Omni VI+ is analog. Yes, there is digital control of many things in the Omni VI, however the signal path from antenna input to headphone output is; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00454.html (8,828 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Corsair II VS Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: "Paul DeWitte K9OT" <k9ot@mhtc.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 15:37:17 -0000; Thanks guys for all of the replies. At least I know that my radios are normal. I like them both and will continue to play with them. One reason that I wanted an Omni VI+ was for the protected receiev; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00463.html (8,073 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]