Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+D\-104\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+D\-104\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: holladayfd@multipro.com (Frank Holladay); Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:31:05 -0600; Jeff, If you find out, pass it along to me! Thanks & 73, Frank, K4VMO; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00601.html (6,096 bytes)
2. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: hmmjr@erols.com (H. M. Motley, Jr.); Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 15:17:11 -0500; D-104's were not originally made for CB radios! There are ads for D-104's going back to the late 1930's - long before CB came into being. They have a rising response curve which yields a very good co; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00302.html (9,866 bytes)
3. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W); Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 15:49:34 -0800; I have a D-104 that I bought new over 25 years ago and it is still going strong. I get great reviews of the transmit audio with the Omni VI as well as the many other rigs I have used it with. (The MI; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00308.html (8,644 bytes)
4. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: rrbunn@tidalwave.net (Rick and Karen Bunn); Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 17:38:07 -0500; I weighed in on this earlier, but as for the use of the mic. I use the astatic 10ADL dynamic head on the D-104 stand on my Collins S-1 and on the KWM-2A, On the Ten-Tec Paragon II and the Kenwood 430; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00348.html (11,104 bytes)
5. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: ve7asr@islandnet.com (Rick Williams); Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 21:22:04 -0700; Thanks to all who replied concerning my D-104. It looks as though the crystal element likely needs replacement. Now the decision ...... replace it with the original or a dynamic element?? I think I'l; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00096.html (7,800 bytes)
6. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.); Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 09:14:52 -0500; Purchase and install a Shure R-5 element. Its a communications element with less response outside the transmit filters and makes a better radio system than the D-104 with its rising characteristic ev; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00108.html (8,144 bytes)
7. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: wowly@email.msn.com (wowly); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 18:53:27 -0400; I concur Larry, K8PUJ --Original Message-- From: Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E. <geraldj@ames.net> To: Rick Williams <ve7asr@islandnet.com> Cc: TenTec <TenTec@contesting.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com>; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00109.html (9,098 bytes)
8. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: JBeamer@PanAmSat.com (Beamer, Jay); Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 10:19:06 -0400; Well Jerry, as you stated, "in some SSB radios". I've been using a D-104 on my Omni V for approx. 2 years with no negative audio reports. I know of several others that use a D-104 on the Omni V or Om; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00117.html (9,785 bytes)
9. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: dacalvin@us.ibm.com (dacalvin@us.ibm.com); Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 10:33:20 -0500; But, by the same argument, most of those overdriven rigs have ALC metering on them (demographically speaking). ALC metering is one place where I don't find I get more information out of a meter than; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00119.html (8,687 bytes)
10. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.); Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 09:47:52 -0500; ALC metering or LED won't indicate any higher then the audio and modulator is overdriven by spectrum components outside the SSB filter bandpass. The ALC meter or LED will only indicate the distortion; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00120.html (8,256 bytes)
11. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: cshyde@yahoo.com (Carl Hyde); Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 08:59:38 -0700 (PDT); If you want a nice sounding mic for a Ten Tec ( and this is not to say the TT mics aren't very good) then stay away from the D-104 since they are for CBs and not real radios and pich up a new Heil Go; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00121.html (10,705 bytes)
12. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: hmmjr@erols.com (H. M. Motley, Jr.); Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 13:18:08 -0400; Check your facts about the D-104 being for CB. CBer's may have adopted it as their mic of choice but the D-104 was around long before CB was a twinkle in the FCC's eyes. I've seen it advertised in QS; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00123.html (9,143 bytes)
13. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (rohre); Date: 10 Jun 1999 18:14:22 -0500; hey Carl, I have to disagree on the D104. In the original unamplified form, it gets rave reviews used on my Ten Tec Scout. I think you might have heard a misapplication of one having the built in amp; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00125.html (8,918 bytes)
14. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: N4NT@wireco.net (Michael O. Hyder); Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 13:17:45 -0400; Damn, I wish I'd said that! Mike -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tente; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00126.html (8,726 bytes)
15. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: N4NT@wireco.net (Michael O. Hyder); Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 13:19:04 -0400; Hams used D-104 microphones long before there WAS a Citizens' Band! Mike -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQU; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00127.html (9,482 bytes)
16. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: JBeamer@PanAmSat.com (Beamer, Jay); Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 10:37:18 -0400; Well gang, on this D104, CarlW2CSH threw a wrench in the whole thing for me yesterday. Below is an excerpt from a personal email from Carl, and hope you don't mind me repeating a portion of it here,; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00133.html (10,729 bytes)
17. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: cshyde@yahoo.com (Carl Hyde); Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 07:57:33 -0700 (PDT); There is another alternative Jay and that is to buy the Astatic 10-DA head instead of the D-104. The 10-d has a flat response and sounds pretty good for $65.00. Has hi and lo impedance also. Its a dy; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00134.html (12,885 bytes)
18. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.); Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 10:14:23 -0500; The D-104 has always been designed for AM with a strong rising frequency response. That was intended to overcome receiver selectivity by supplying audio preemphasis to the high frequency components,; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00135.html (10,043 bytes)
19. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W); Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 09:20:52 -0700; Can't one just bypass that "stupid" preamp? My 25 year old D-104 does not have that (never did) and I get GREAT audio reports using it with my Omni VI/3 (gain set at about 1 - 2 o'clock). Reid, K7YX; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00136.html (11,507 bytes)
20. [TenTec] D-104 (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (rohre); Date: 11 Jun 1999 12:39:54 -0500; Yes, you can bypass the audio amp. in the base of the newer D-104 mikes! You should be able to add some RC filtering to roll off the higher frequency response of the basic element as well. SImply tak; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00137.html (9,024 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]