Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+DSP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+DSP\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] DSP (score: 1): Author: kd7efq62@hotmail.com (M.Todd Miskel); Date: Wed Apr 30 07:31:30 2003; I hope no one took my posting as a bashing 6+, Although I am an SSB op, and even though the 6+ is an outstanding CW rig, I know I get the benefits of it's design on SSB too. I will be doing the inrad; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00824.html (7,045 bytes)
2. [TenTec] dsp (score: 1): Author: ku3g@yahoo.com (JOHN); Date: Wed Apr 30 08:17:29 2003; i was under the impression that the dsp on the Omni vi was IF dsp and all these outboards units were audio, please straighten me out on this john ku3g -- Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00827.html (6,256 bytes)
3. [TenTec] DSP (score: 1): Author: ron@intws.com (Ron McKean); Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 14:51:43 -0400; Scott, Thanks for the article. I can't disagree on any point. You are probably right; hams are notoriously cheap and would probably pirate any upgrade that you offered for sale. Anyone who has purcha; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00603.html (12,951 bytes)
4. [TenTec] DSP (score: 1): Author: jkbelt@spiritone.com (Jim and Kate Belt); Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 14:48:25 -0700; Has anyone had a first hand experience comparing the DSP in the OMNI VI+ with the W9GR and the MFJ DSP's? And if so, what did you discover? All the great things I've heard about the OMNI VI+ on CW ar; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00351.html (6,651 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]