Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+DSP\s+Engine\s+in\s+New\s+Rig\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+DSP\s+Engine\s+in\s+New\s+Rig\?\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] DSP Engine in New Rig? (score: 1): Author: kayser@sympatico.ca (Larry Kayser); Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:13:36 -0400; Greetings: Does anyone know if the new little TT HF rig uses the same DSP engine as the Pegsus and Jupiter? If it does use the same DSP engine is it reasonable to expect that the new rig will have th; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00187.html (8,011 bytes)
2. [TenTec] DSP Engine in New Rig? (score: 1): Author: wa2tti@worldlynx.net (Jerry Harley); Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:40:11 -0400; What problems??????????????????????????????????? -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00189.html (8,654 bytes)
3. [TenTec] DSP Engine in New Rig? (score: 1): Author: kayser@sympatico.ca (Larry Kayser); Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:05:27 -0400; Jerry: Pegasus and Jupiter have serious problems with receive mushy receive sound, poor quality transmit CW note, and for my work here the transmit side tone is sitting in the middle of the receive a; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00191.html (8,790 bytes)
4. [TenTec] DSP Engine in New Rig? (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:24:53 -0400; I just checked this on my Pegasus. The CW sidetone is up at approximately 25% of full volume and is not affected by the DSP notch/NR function. If your sidetone is being affected by the DSP system, y; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00192.html (8,910 bytes)
5. [TenTec] DSP Engine in New Rig? (score: 1): Author: wo8l@att.net (wo8l@att.net); Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:56:24 +0000; Hey Larry, I read your posting on Ten Tec's DSP with interest. What you're describing, though, is not so much problems with the Pegasus and Jupiter. Actually, you pretty well describe the nature of D; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00193.html (11,550 bytes)
6. [TenTec] DSP Engine in New Rig? (score: 1): Author: wo8l@att.net (wo8l@att.net); Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:18:40 +0000; Larry, One of the most cumbersome ergonomic problems with the Kenwood TS570 is that the device which moves from memory to memory and from filter to filter are the same knob. If you take the filters o; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00202.html (16,065 bytes)
7. [TenTec] DSP Engine in New Rig? (score: 1): Author: klycotek01@home.com (Frank Gilmore); Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:07:48 -0500; Some of my most frustrating experiences have been with Kenwood....both as a former ham dealer and as a user. Purchased a new TS-940 loaded to the gills when they came out. Great radio...when it worke; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00203.html (9,261 bytes)
8. [TenTec] DSP Engine in New Rig? (score: 1): Author: James Parsons" <k5rov@arrl.net (James Parsons); Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:29:55 -0500; seems This is the reason I stopped buying TenTec. I operate primarily (95 percent) CW. I bought three Scouts at different times, one new, two used from TenTec. Each one had considerable drift at 25; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00205.html (10,129 bytes)
9. [TenTec] DSP Engine in New Rig? (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:25:10 -0500; Jim, one of the first things we learned in "Quality" training long ago at TI is that you cannot service-in or PR-in quality to a product. It must be designed in and that design must stem from the bes; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00206.html (10,895 bytes)
10. [TenTec] DSP Engine in New Rig? (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:01:57 -0700; The discussion regarding the performance of DSP, either IF or AF, reminds me of the discussions that surrounded the introduction of digital audio vs. analog audio years ago. Even today with higher bi; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00211.html (9,791 bytes)
11. [TenTec] DSP Engine in New Rig? (score: 1): Author: kayser@sympatico.ca (Larry Kayser); Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 08:59:19 -0400; Paul: No Paul, I dont have a problem with the transceiver and I sent the Pegasus back to TT some time back. DSP notch/NR function is not involved and the residual CW sidetone in the RX audio output o; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00212.html (11,051 bytes)
12. [TenTec] DSP Engine in New Rig? (score: 1): Author: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W); Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:14:51 -0700; Then why are you wasting bandwidth here? I have had horrible experiences with "Jappy rigs" over the years and no longer own any and won't buy any, but I don't waste bandwidth on those lists telling t; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00225.html (10,030 bytes)
13. [TenTec] DSP Engine in New Rig? (score: 1): Author: jmlowman@ix.netcom.com (Jim Lowman); Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:08:38 -0700; For my money, if there are problems with T-T products I'd like to see them here. There is room for both sides of the argument. While no manufacturer makes the perfect product, the T-T products that I; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00226.html (11,244 bytes)
14. [TenTec] DSP Engine in New Rig? (score: 1): Author: James Parsons" <k5rov@arrl.net (James Parsons); Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:32:51 -0500; Am I wasting bandwidth here? I have a few TenTec items here including my Centaur. I am planning on buying another old Corsair II just to play with (I really liked that rig). But no new TenTecs at thi; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00229.html (11,784 bytes)
15. [TenTec] DSP Engine in New Rig? (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:22:15 -0500; There is something about the Emperor and his clothes . . . 72/73, George W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas QRP-L 1373 NETXQRP 6 Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in Collin county EM13qe Amateur Radio W5Y; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00230.html (8,812 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]