Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+DSP\s+and\s+older\s+Ten\s+Tecs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+DSP\s+and\s+older\s+Ten\s+Tecs\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] DSP and older Ten Tecs (score: 1): Author: "Rick and Karen Bunn" <RRBunn@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 15:14:59 -0400; I have the MFJ DSP unit and its fine for CW and Digital modes, but I find that it does not enhance SSB. Has anyone used the SGC or other DSP units on the Paragon II or Corsair II and had better resul; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00010.html (6,754 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] DSP and older Ten Tecs (score: 1): Author: w7kxb@comcast.net; Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:23:03 +0000; Hello Rick/n4ask: I have a SGC- ADSP2 filter in my Corsair II and Argonaut V. Workes great on both units, especially the 516 which does not have an RF gain control. The SGC NR will knock down the ban; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00017.html (7,983 bytes)
3. Re:[TenTec] DSP and older Ten Tecs (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 20:33:54 -0400; I had good experience running a ClearSpeech speaker mobile, so when I got a deal on another unit I grabbed it. These are extremely effective adaptive noise reduction DSP units made by NCT (Noise Canc; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00030.html (8,459 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] DSP and older Ten Tecs (score: 1): Author: "Michael Melland, W9WIS" <w9wis@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 20:25:42 -0700; I tried a Timewave 59+ with my Omni V.9 once two years ago and sold it a week after buying it. I hated it on SSB and found no real improvement using it on CW over the great stock filters. YMMV.......; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00033.html (7,591 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] DSP and older Ten Tecs (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 21:44:53 -0400; Hi, I have a Timewave DSP-59+ and find it very useful with a older rig like my Triton IV, 540. I have used it with my Omni VI+, and find the DSP filter redundant with the dual 500 and 250 hz. filters; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00034.html (8,320 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] DSP and older Ten Tecs (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 16:19:36 -1000; The ClearSpeech unit analyzes the sound and does a very good job of removing any steady noise in about a second, hetrodynes included. It responds slow enough that it can be used with CW that isn't to; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00038.html (8,721 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] DSP and older Ten Tecs (score: 1): Author: "Ed and Janet" <janed@burgoyne.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 21:13:13 -0600; I also bought one of these units and it is not good for CW so I sent it back I don't work phone so don't know, they may work good there. Ed K7UC -- Original Message -- From: "Ken Brown" <ken.d.brown@; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00044.html (9,425 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] DSP and older Ten Tecs (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 05:50:09 -0400; I did fiddle around with some shielding, rerouting wiring, and added filtering without success. There is at least one transformer on the CS board, and I suspect that the field near the TT power suppl; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00052.html (9,105 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]