Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+DSP\s+filtering\s+Negative\s+Feelings\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+DSP\s+filtering\s+Negative\s+Feelings\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] DSP filtering Negative Feelings (score: 1): Author: n4py@earthlink.net (Carl Moreschi); Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 00:57:50 +0100; I am confused at all the negative feelings I see posted about DSP filtering. In all my years hamming using collins mechanical filters, multipole crystal filters and the like, I have never seen anythi; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00164.html (7,466 bytes)
2. [TenTec] DSP filtering Negative Feelings (score: 1): Author: malonej@c2i2.com (Jack, W7EJJ); Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:56:06 -0700; Hi Carl: I agree with you after my 50 years of ham radio there is nothing compared to DSP. What sold me on it was a JRC NRD-545 receiver I purchased about a year ago. That has full DSP with 40 bit pr; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00166.html (8,828 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]