Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+DX\s+radios\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+DX\s+radios\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: ron <roncasa@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 15:54:09 -0400; "Got him!" How many times have I also heard that from QRP ops. Guys can boast what rigs they have and it don't mean a thing. In the end, it's the operator. Peace Ron ________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00604.html (8,054 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: "Gary D Krause" <n7hts@bresnan.net>; Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 14:05:52 -0600; I agree! Gary _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00605.html (8,681 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: john ferro <foxbat426@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 16:11:59 -0400; and the OII.... during good conditions > > I love to use the Collins or Drake, it's just FUN. If things get tough I pull > > out the OII and... GOT HIM!> >> > boast what rigs they have and it don't m; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00606.html (9,347 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 16:51:31 EDT; Not so fast... Yes good operational procudures, timing and experience is citical... And it is probably overall the most important thing...Along with a great antenna. But all radios are not the same.; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00608.html (7,411 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: RaySoifer@cs.com; Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 18:26:09 EDT; OK, I've never had Drake, Elecraft or Flex. However, I've used many radios, including the S-line and various riceboxes, during my 50+ years as an active DXer, and I agree: the O II is very much the b; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00609.html (6,581 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: ron <roncasa@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 19:07:38 -0400; Thank you for proving my point: Guys can boast what rigs they have and it don't mean a thing if they do not know enough to use it. again, it's the operator. Thank you Peace Ron _____________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00611.html (7,909 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: john ferro <foxbat426@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 19:22:19 -0400; ok point taken - but nothing substitutes for a great antenna - period! there are some instances where all the bells and whistles will get the station - they are far and few between though - i've got; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00612.html (9,394 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Whitman" <wwhitman@fastmail.fm>; Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 18:28:07 -0500; Agreed Ray. Having been an S-Line owner and still owning Drake 4B twins, the Orion II is the best I have ever had. 73, Wayne K4ELO k4elo@fastmail.fm _______________________________________________ Te; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00613.html (7,341 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Whitman" <wwhitman@fastmail.fm>; Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 19:21:54 -0500; Agreed Ray. Having been an S-Line owner and still owning Drake 4B twins, the Orion II is the best I have ever had. 73, Wayne K4ELO k4elo@fastmail.fm _______________________________________________ Te; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00614.html (7,708 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: Bill Rowlett <kc4atu@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 00:29:08 +0000; OK, but what is great for you may not be for someone else. We can all agree that you need the best antenna system for your location, note the word system. Too many folks put up a beam and than feed i; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00615.html (8,644 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 22:30:36 EDT; Ron, You are very correct... In fact there is a lot of things you can do to optimize even a 45 year old Collins S line when you operate it. Little things like knowing where to set the RF gain, and us; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00618.html (8,719 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: john ferro <foxbat426@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 22:48:49 -0400; remember comparing the OII with an old collins isn't really fair - it's old school vs new school - like apples and oranges. run the OII's receiver against a more modern receiver such as the aor 7030; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00620.html (10,272 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 23:21:32 EDT; Of course we shouldn't even compare a Collins or Drake with the new stuff.... But ya know sometimes they are more fun to run. The Drake RX (Modified Sherwood ONLY) is actally in the same league as th; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00623.html (8,454 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 21:35:07 -0600; Call that a Beat Frequency Oscillator! The S-3B/C also has that option. Pass band tuning in the previous 75A4 was a mechanical coupling between the BFO and the main VFO that moved them together at th; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00624.html (10,159 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: john ferro <foxbat426@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 10:57:38 -0400; larry, what i am talking about is all things considered equal, the OII won't hear anything more than the rigs i mentioned, plus many others. read - all things considered equal. yes some operators are; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00634.html (13,856 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: Bill Rowlett <kc4atu@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 15:33:11 +0000; Antenna system, Operator skills, then and only then the Rig. 73 and good DX Bill KC4ATU> From: foxbat426@hotmail.com> To: tentec@contesting.com> Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 10:57:38 -0400> Subject: Re: [T; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00635.html (14,748 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: john ferro <foxbat426@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 11:37:43 -0400; how about this: the rig, the operators skills and then and only then the antenna system! you could twist it anyway you want!> From: kc4atu@hotmail.com> To: tentec@contesting.com> Date: Sat, 31 May 20; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00636.html (15,502 bytes)
18. [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: "W1GOR" <W1GOR@maine.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 12:12:20 -0400; Hi John, You've made my point..! All of the guys in that tour are great, in their own way... It's a team effort, not a competition. Ham radio is a wonderful example of team efforts, especially in mul; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00638.html (10,509 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: john ferro <foxbat426@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 12:50:31 -0400; larry you are right - absolutely - but my point from the start is that too much credance is on the radio - not enough on the antenna - lets face it you can fall in love with a radio - antennas are bo; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00639.html (11,765 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] DX radios (score: 1): Author: "W1GOR" <W1GOR@maine.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 13:56:05 -0400; John, We agree on the often misdirected affection for the 'radio', caused by the visual impact, published specs, and the sheer grandiosity of spending thousands of dollars for equipment that will als; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00644.html (11,369 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]