Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Difference\s+Between\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s+and\s+Paragon\s+II\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Difference Between Omni VI+ and Paragon II (score: 1)
Author: "Wayne Bilodeau" <wayneb@lightstream.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:56:28 -0400 (EDT)
Hello, Can anyone please tell me the significant differences between an Omni VI+ (option 3 upgrade) and a Paragon II other than noise reduction, shortwave bands, and AM ? I am thinking about trading
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00480.html (6,911 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Difference Between Omni VI+ and Paragon II (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:19:19 -0000
Yes, you have specified the main differences. Because the Paragon II has general coverage, it has a little noisier synthesizer then the Omni VI, but still not bad. Carl Moreschi N4PY Franklinton, Nor
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00482.html (8,793 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Difference Between Omni VI+ and Paragon II (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:36:32 -0400
P2 has no filter options in the first IF stage, no sidetone/off-set compensation, display reads center freq. instead of offset forcing you to mentally calculate actual freq (this needs verfying) No k
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00484.html (9,035 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Difference Between Omni VI+ and Paragon II (score: 1)
Author: "Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales" <sales@tentec.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:18:10 -0400
At 12:56 PM 8/11/04 -0400, you wrote: Hello, Can anyone please tell me the significant differences between an Omni VI+ (option 3 upgrade) and a Paragon II other than noise reduction, shortwave bands,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00486.html (8,736 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Difference Between Omni VI+ and Paragon II (score: 1)
Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:08:18 -0400
If I understand it correctly, Stan please correct me if I am wrong, the Paragon and Paragon II are basically the same rig except for the processor board and AM operation. Having said that, what I fin
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00487.html (9,562 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Difference Between Omni VI+ and Paragon II (score: 1)
Author: "Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales" <sales@tentec.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:45:04 -0400
Hi All: Sorry, again I responded to the entire group and that was not my intentions. The basic difference between the two Paragons are more than I list here but basically the Paragon II included both
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00489.html (9,829 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Difference Between Omni VI+ and Paragon II (score: 1)
Author: Don Watters <ve1bn@eastlink.ca>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:48:09 -0300
What is you home fone nr? To me directly please. Don , VE1BN@eastlink.ca _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00490.html (8,809 bytes)

8. [TenTec] Difference Between Omni VI+ and Paragon II (score: 1)
Author: Lee Crocker <w9oy@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
I never had a Omni and I just sold my Paragon, which was an excellent performer. If I were you however I would consider getting a RX-320D which decodes DRM, or consider trading for a Jupiter or a Peg
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00499.html (8,583 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Difference Between Omni VI+ and Paragon II (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 23:08:15 -0000
The display frequency on the Paragon II reads correctly in all modes. Carl Moreschi N4PY Franklinton, North Carolina n4py@earthlink.net -- Original Message -- From: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com> To: <tente
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00503.html (10,919 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Difference Between Omni VI+ and Paragon II (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:16:04 -0400
Great...I wasn't sure if they had progressed that far or not at the time. The P2 is a wonderful rig. The only thing you need to watch out for is not letting your supply voltage slip down much below 1
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00504.html (12,029 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Difference Between Omni VI+ and Paragon II (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Miller WB5OXQ" <wb5oxq@grandecom.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:36:34 -0500
I had a Paragon before the Omni 6+ and the noise reduction on the 6 is much better. There are a few other features on the 6 that the Paragon did not have. I would rather buy a good short wave radio f
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00505.html (9,982 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Difference Between Omni VI+ and Paragon II (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:11:07 -1000
n4lq wrote: No keyer (Omni's keyer NG anyway) I thought so too, until I got it into the mode I am accustomed to. Mode 'B' I think, and now it is fine with me. No memories or other features, still a b
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00512.html (8,766 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Difference Between Omni VI+ and Paragon II (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 05:40:35 -0400
Seems like the dashes are too short on the 6's internal keyer. Throws off my timming and sound jerky on the air. Maybe it's not exactly 3:1 or maybe the rest of them are all off, dunno. Steve N4LQ --
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00514.html (9,841 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu