Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Differences\s+in\s+Paragon\s+I\s+and\s+II\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Differences\s+in\s+Paragon\s+I\s+and\s+II\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Differences in Paragon I and II? (score: 1): Author: john.brewer@us.schneider-electric.com; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 08:02:06 -0400; Can someone summarize the differences between the Paragon 1 and 2? Are there substantial differences, and is computer logging possible with either/both of them? Thank you! John ______________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00681.html (7,318 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Differences in Paragon I and II? (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:40:06 -0000; Computer logging is definitely possible with the Paragon II. The Paragon II uses an Icom CIV computer interface just like the Omni VI. The main difference between the PI and PII is the PII has band r; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00682.html (7,985 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Differences in Paragon I and II? (score: 1): Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:44:34 -0400; John, I have finally gotten my Paragon II to talk to my computer. The key is that it uses an Icom-765 interface (or an Omni 6 (not the +)) interface. TRX-Manager works with it as does XMLog. You must; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00697.html (7,370 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Differences in Paragon I and II? (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:02:11 -0400; Good comparison. Note that by substituting a Giehl chip for the original chip in the PI (a simple plug-in install) you get the band-stacking registers and one-touch changing to any band as well. This; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00736.html (8,191 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Differences in Paragon I and II? (score: 1): Author: Bruce Sugarberg <bsugarberg@core.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:23:28 -0400; Hello, Does the Giehl chip allow you to transmit AM? 73, Bruce WA8TNC == Vic Klein wrote: Good comparison. Note that by substituting a Giehl chip for the original chip in the PI (a simple plug-in ins; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00764.html (9,127 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Differences in Paragon I and II? (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:43:30 -0000; No, the Paragon I does not have AM transmit capability in the hardware. Carl Moreschi N4PY Franklinton, NC -- Original Message -- From: "Bruce Sugarberg" <bsugarberg@core.com> To: <tentec@contesting.; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00794.html (9,448 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Differences in Paragon I and II? (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptdprolog.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 11:29:07 -0000; Nope, just improvements in the processor operation like additional memories, improved display legibility (month's spelled out, eliminate "/" in zeros), and greatly improved front panel controls for b; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00804.html (8,045 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]