Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Direct\s+Conversion\s+receiver\s+1056\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Direct\s+Conversion\s+receiver\s+1056\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Direct Conversion receiver 1056 (score: 1): Author: k5id@ipa.net (Ken Graham); Date: Mon, 10 May 99 16:50:16 PDT; Hi ALL, I'm wondering if anyone can give me some feedback on the 1056 direct conversion rx kit by TKIT?? It looks like it has possibilities as a small separate ham band rx. I would appreciate your re; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00219.html (7,137 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Direct Conversion receiver 1056 (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington N4LQ); Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 23:09:34 -0400; I've not owned one but a guy at work has one. He says it has great audio but the front end tends to get overloaded by strong short wave stations. 73 Steve N4LQ --Original Message-- From: Ken Graham <; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00223.html (8,142 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Direct Conversion receiver 1056 (score: 1): Author: weingaertner@nac.net (Robert Weingaertner); Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 20:40:20 -0400; Its probably better than most direct conversion receivers. D-C receivers sound surprisingly good and Ten Tec made their first ones around 1969. It got a good review in the Worldradio News QRP column.; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00299.html (8,378 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]