Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Don\'t\s+like\s+QSK\s+\/\s+TUNE\s+Knobs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Don\'t\s+like\s+QSK\s+\/\s+TUNE\s+Knobs\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Don't like QSK / TUNE Knobs (score: 1): Author: "Dave Fifield" <dave@ad6a.com>; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 02:05:16 -0700; Am I alone in not actually liking QSK at all? I much prefer semi break-in, which, of course, the (my) Orion is fully capable of being tweaked to acheive. Dave F. AD6A ________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00703.html (7,176 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Don't like QSK / TUNE Knobs (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 09:17:51 EDT; Me too! OK, I don't have the latest rev on yet, Did TT change the QSK delay parameter so we can have a longer delay than before? It wasn't quite long enough for slower speed operation (15 WPM) Lee __; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00709.html (6,844 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Don't like QSK / TUNE Knobs (score: 1): Author: "Steve Ellington" <N4LQ@igLou.com>; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 13:08:04 -0000; Most people don't like QSK. I got my start in cw by handling traffic, "cw messages" on the cw nets. QSK is a necessity for traffic handling. The receiving operator must be able to instantly break the; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00718.html (10,491 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]