Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Eagle\s*$/: 173 ]

Total 173 documents matching your query.

101. [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: JOHN <ku3g@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 07:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Is anyone using the new Eagle with a non qsk amplifier , and if so are you having any problems 73 john ku3g _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com h
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00058.html (7,083 bytes)

102. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:14:46 +0200
Not yet but I plan to do so. I have an AL-80B. In preparation I have purchased an MFJ-495 Keyer. With it, I can adjust the delay in sending the first dit to the transceiver, as well as the hang delay
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00059.html (7,512 bytes)

103. [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 16:48:42 -0500
EAGLE FOR SALE _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-01/msg00028.html (6,768 bytes)

104. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: Jim Vohland <n9vo@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 16:51:23 -0500
Price/Condx/Pix _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-01/msg00029.html (6,968 bytes)

105. [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: John Molenda <cdistflatfoot@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:14:54 -0500
Question on the Eagle , I only need the AM and FM filters for the radio to transmit in those modes correct ? I would be able to listen to AM and FM regardless if the filters were installed or not . I
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00605.html (6,763 bytes)

106. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:58:04 +0100
John, I don't think there is a way to know what filters are inside the rig without opening it. You said you got a 6kc filter wrapped in plastic; well if it is really 6kc, it's the AM filter, not a CW
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00606.html (8,714 bytes)

107. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Chris Hansohn <chris.hansohn@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:58:49 -0500
I would open it up and see what is installed. To transmit FM and AM, you have to have the specific filters for each (15k and 6k respectively). If you don't have those filters, the maximum bandwidth i
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00607.html (8,385 bytes)

108. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:59:42 +0100
Also, yes, you can listen to AM using the SSB filter. However you won't hear much on FM that way. Question on the Eagle , I only need the AM and FM filters for the radio to transmit in those modes co
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00608.html (7,784 bytes)

109. [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: John Molenda <cdistflatfoot@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:09:44 -0500
I checked the inside of the Eagle and I have what looks like an FM board (looks different from the other filters made up of several components. It says FM on that board . then I have a 300 kz filter
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00609.html (7,402 bytes)

110. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Chris Hansohn <chris.hansohn@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:10:39 -0500
Yes, you have what you need for AM rcv. Just push the MOD button to AM then adjust the BW to your liking. Chris, K4RCH -- _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@co
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00611.html (8,041 bytes)

111. [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:04:18 -0500
I got a 2.8 filter from inrad for my Eagle got great audio reports. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00103.html (6,339 bytes)

112. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Mcgraw" <rmcgraw@blomand.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:10:19 -0600 (CST)
What makes the INRAD 2.8 KHz filter better than the stock filter supplied in the Eagle? Did you not get great reports with the stock filter? 73 Bob, K4TAX ____________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00108.html (7,724 bytes)

113. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 21:24:20 +0000
Is that filter is in the tx signal path of the Eagle? The tx signal isn't filtered entirely in dsp with configurable bandwidth? 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec m
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00114.html (7,711 bytes)

114. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:18:02 +0000
I just took the time to read through the Eagle manual. Much to my surprise, the spec section seems to indicate that ssb tx bandwidth IS determined by the roofing filter. So yes, changing the roofing
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00122.html (8,592 bytes)

115. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:21:16 -0500
I installed the filter in the am slot did a a/b test on 40m with 4 hams got better audio with 2.8 than 2.4. Is that filter is in the tx signal path of the Eagle? The tx signal isn't filtered entirely
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00123.html (8,737 bytes)

116. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:32:05 +0000
And of course I missed the later info that there's a fixed 2.4Khz dsp filter preceding the roofing filter. So it's hard to believe that the change in roofing filter would make much of a difference. 7
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00124.html (9,224 bytes)

117. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: "mcelmer1" <mcelmer1@netecin.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:09:54 -0700
Makes sense. Mike W8TRN -- Original Message -- From: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 11:21 Subject: Re: [Ten
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00162.html (9,762 bytes)

118. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:54:27 -0600
Was that slot configured for 2.4 KHz or 6.0 KHz? If 6.0KHz, did you leave the 2.4 KHz in the original slot and how was that slot configured? I'd like more detail as to what filter is actually in F1,
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00165.html (10,143 bytes)

119. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:26:30 -0600
So would one surmise that removing the 2.4 KHz filter, leaving the slot configured for 2.4 KHz since transmit SSB mode is going to looking for a 2.4 KHz filter, but physically installing a 6.0 KHz fi
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00166.html (10,199 bytes)

120. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:23:10 -0600
Having worked in the telecommunications industry for over twenty-two years, with the initial five years with telephone transmission and switching of 300 Hz to 3000 Hz (2.7 kHz bandwidth) circuits as
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00173.html (11,548 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
This search system is powered by Namazu