Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Eagle\s*$/: 173 ]

Total 173 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Carl Winkles <jcwinks@att.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
The Eagle manual is now available on the TenTec website, along with pictures and the brochure.   Carl, K4SEV _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00369.html (7,855 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Art Trampler <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
In a word, I would say no. I contest routinely at K5GO, m/m, and I am confident looking at the numbers even in QST that close-in signal handling capability is not up to the task.   We run a mix of K3
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00370.html (9,523 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:27:48 -0700
Lots of FT2000 and FT1000 series radios have been sold or are for sale by contesters. Their owners replaced them with K3s. The primary reason is that the K3 is almost 20dB better in terms of front en
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00372.html (8,532 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:52:12 -0500
I think it is pretty obvious to those who have watched recent TT models why the Eagle comes out now. The Argonaut V QRP HF transceiver has been retired. The Jupiter was refreshed with a different dis
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00375.html (10,450 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:16:52 -0500
The K3 has become our radio of choice for the portable xpeditions. That was a no-brainer. For the fixed stations, we can't agree on which radio to standardize on. Lots of Orion I's and K3s, and a few
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00378.html (9,659 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:50:13 -0400
Al, Not in my opinion... 73, Lee In serious contesting would a FT-2000 or 2000D be considered as a viable rig. Just wondering as I might want to get one someday if my FT-1000MP ever quits. many tnx f
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00381.html (8,353 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:58:17 -0400
The K3 is certainly a great radio...I think I prefer the bigger real estate and front panel of my Orion II. 73, Lee, KC9CDT The K3 has become our radio of choice for the portable xpeditions. That was
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00382.html (10,236 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: "Art Trampler" <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:42:32 -0500
Stuart, I've already decided that I want an Eagle. It's 2khz specs are about 10-13 db better than those of the Omni VII, which is one of the first things I look at with my use. So now I just need to
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00383.html (12,012 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 01:59:19 -0400
* DING ! Perhaps they don't understand what it is. * DING ! Bet-cha I can beat-cha with one rig tied behind my back... ;-) OK... just poking some fun. Nothing serious here. BUT ...I WANT a rig with
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00395.html (10,589 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:07:56 -0500
Art, I think it is commendable that you are selling the filters with the VI rig. Yeah, I am looking at the Eagle, but had not gotten into the detailed specs yet. I was impressed that it was packaged,
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00438.html (10,121 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:11:18 -0500
The Eagle looks like it is in between the K3 and the larger base radios in size, a good compromise. I like the wide spaces between controls. Stuart Rohre K5KVH _______________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00439.html (8,519 bytes)

32. [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: "Roy" <royanjoy@ncn.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:52:12 -0500
Download the owner's manual. K6XK _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00046.html (6,307 bytes)

33. [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 17:00:37 -1000
Does that mean that Ten-Tec will sell two optional filters for it, and there is space for one in the radio, or does it mean that there is space for two optional filters in the radio? Sorry if this h
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00066.html (7,447 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 22:39:37 -0500
73, Gary - AB9M _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00067.html (8,310 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 22:57:06 -0500
Hi Ken, The Eagle has three filter slots: Filter Slot 1 (F1), Filter Slot 2 (F2), Filter Slot 3 (F3). The Eagle comes standard with a 2.4KHz filter installed in Filter Slot 1 (F1). Optional filters a
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00068.html (8,789 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 18:24:11 -1000
Hi Rick, Thanks for the clairification on the filter slots. Some opinions would include AM and FM in the description of an "all mode ham." Perhaps having only three slots opens up an opportunity for
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00069.html (7,985 bytes)

37. [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: "Paul DeWitte" <k9ot@yousq.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:20:11 -0500
If the Eagle has landed somewhere, it must be a secret as I do not see anyone talking about how theirs is great or not so great. Paul K9OT _______________________________________________ TenTec maili
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00258.html (7,657 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: Steve Berg <wa9jml@tbc.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:28:45 -0500
I am hopping that they are having so much fun with their new radio, that they are not using their computers. I am going to visit the factory in a few weeks, and I will be looking at one of these or a
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00259.html (8,276 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: Jeramy Ross <jeramy@w5xtl.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:34:44 -0400
There's quite a bit of discussion over on the Ten-Tec Eagle groups on Yahoo. Jeramy W5XTL ________________________________________ From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00260.html (9,007 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:41:26 -0400
What a bummer!!! Hopefully some of those folks will post some comments here so those of us who refuse to log on to Yahoo will hear about the rig. If not, that's the price we pay for not being willing
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00261.html (8,001 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu