Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Eagle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Eagle\s*$/: 173 ]

Total 173 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:26:32 -0500; Where have you been? We were talking the first few days. After one week of comparing, I sold my K3. I'm not saying the Eagle is better, but I prefer working with it. 73 Rick If the Eagle has landed s; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00262.html (8,365 bytes)
42. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "ROD" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:58:06 -0400; is is a updated Jupiter with a roofing filter and 6m _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00263.html (9,768 bytes)
43. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:41:08 -0500; NO. It is an Omni VI with DSP filters in the second IF instead of Xtal filters. Or, you could also say it is similar to the main receiver in an Orion. It certainly is a league above a Jupiter. (which; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00265.html (10,357 bytes)
44. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "ROD" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:19:37 -0400; on a Omni you have a button for bands. The Eagle is like the Jupiter it does not even have a up or down for bands. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contestin; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00266.html (11,939 bytes)
45. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "N4PY2" <n4py2@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:33:56 -0400; It has a button labelled "BAN". This moves you up obr band each time you press it. If you press FNC then the BAN button moves you down one band. If you want better control, my N4PY Orion software wil; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00267.html (13,175 bytes)
46. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "ROD" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:40:54 -0400; That is great that why I like your programs. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00268.html (14,113 bytes)
47. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: Carl Winkles <jcwinks@att.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:39:06 -0700 (PDT); I have been enjoying the problem of finding a place for the Eagle on my desk. I was kind of thinking it would be like a 100 watt Argonaut V, but it's more like a little Orion. And yes, it is signific; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00269.html (8,445 bytes)
48. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:16:57 -0500; Rod, do you buy a rig to play with buttons and gadgets, or do you buy it to receive and transmit? I am talking about the performance of the rig, not how you use it. If you mean ergonomics, then you c; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00271.html (9,059 bytes)
49. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:45:13 -1000; I'm curious about the Eagle. Maybe I'll get me one. I'm interested in the ergonomics and the performance. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com ht; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00272.html (8,558 bytes)
50. [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1): Author: Jliving39@aol.com; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 03:47:09 EDT; Folks, Am ordering my Eagle on Friday. After careful consideration will place it between the OMNI VIplus and the OMNI VII. jim, K4CFA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing li; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00273.html (7,600 bytes)
51. [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "ROD" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:05:47 -0400; Mabe John Henry can make a remote head for the Eagle it could plug in the usb jack then I could go mobil. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com htt; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00300.html (6,365 bytes)
52. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:03:56 -0500; Rod, have you seen the Eagle? It is small enough to fit on a slant board made up to fit the transmission hump on cars, and thus angle the panel up toward easy control use while mobile. Some have held; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00308.html (7,565 bytes)
53. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "ROD" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:14:14 -0400; yes that should work, my Dad had a mount made for a KWM2 to fit the hump most cars today you can not mount a radio I got a ft857d this is the only radio I can use in my car. 73 Rod Rod, have you seen; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00309.html (8,169 bytes)
54. [TenTec] EAGLE (score: 1): Author: "ROD" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:59:51 -0400; I just received a Eagle works great I was talking to a ham who also got a Eagle we were having a good time talking about are new radios I told him that I think it would be great it ten tec would a po; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00317.html (7,570 bytes)
55. Re: [TenTec] EAGLE (score: 1): Author: "Pumbaa" <pinkertontommrs@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:19:50 -0500; Ten-Tec can't be responsible for every ham that doesn't bother to read the owner's manual. I just received a Eagle works great I was talking to a ham who also got a Eagle we were having a good time t; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00319.html (8,161 bytes)
56. [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "ROD" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:46:06 -0400; I just got off a round table with 8 hams all like to see the power output of there radios. swr just tells you have reflected power witch is what you want but, they all wanted to know there power outp; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00326.html (7,558 bytes)
57. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:49:42 -0600; There are wattmeters from Collins, MFJ, Comet, Yeasu, Icom, Kenwood, Bird, and myriad other makers that are not dependent on a particular brand of radio, often with better precision than simple coupl; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00327.html (8,089 bytes)
58. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: art davis <n4uc@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:05:08 -0500; Ten Tec now sells a really nice cross-needle swr/wattmeter. Model 1225 on their website. I have one and it works great. I calibrated mine with an Alpha ($1000) meter and it's pretty accurate. _______; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00328.html (9,065 bytes)
59. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com; Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:33:51 -0400; With the Eagle you can easily know what output power you have. There is a "POWER" adjustment, the value of which is displayed on screen. If the ALC light is flashing on voice modulation or on solid o; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00000.html (7,394 bytes)
60. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: Dave Humbertson <w3np@atlanticbb.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:05:08 -0400; Has anyone verified how accurate the actual power out is in reference to what it is set to be? Does a setting of 100 w out equal 97-103 watts or so? The reason I ask is that my Omni 7's (I have 2), b; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00001.html (8,534 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]