Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Eagle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Eagle\s*$/: 173 ]

Total 173 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "Tom Stone" <sail8@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:12:21 -0400; Guess you aren't the only one with lower power output than indicated...... Has anyone verified how accurate the actual power out is in reference to what it is set to be? Does a setting of 100 w out e; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00002.html (9,200 bytes)
62. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py2@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:12:51 -0400; I see similar power differences. My LP-100A shows about 10 percent less power output than my Omni VII or Eagle. I think that is normal. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Dr. Hays, NC 28635 www.n4py.; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00003.html (9,024 bytes)
63. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com; Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:04:14 -0400; 'Couple things, The difference between 88 watts and 100 watts is about 0.55 db which is slightly less than 0.1 S unit (using 6db per S unit). Can anyone hear that difference under anything other than; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00004.html (8,812 bytes)
64. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 09:46:50 -0600; The solid state PA, especially at 12 volts, is very particular about the supply voltage IN the radio. A small drop hurts the power output, so if the power supply regulation isn't perfect, the power l; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00008.html (10,310 bytes)
65. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: mike bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 13:21:09 -0400; Lee, you're absolutely right! but... I still paid for a 100 watt radio. I shouldn't have to tweak and peak the trimmers inside to set the power correctly. The omni VI I own shows about 80 watts give; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00010.html (11,001 bytes)
66. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 18:19:13 +0000 (UTC); The speedometer in my Rav 4 is off by 2 MPH. The outside temp is off by 2 deg F. No, I haven't taken it back and complained, even though last winter when it was 1 deg outside, I had a 400% error Dave; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00012.html (12,054 bytes)
67. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:33:01 -0600; In the 50s cars left Detroit with speedometers that read 10 mph fast at 60. It was intentional, the makers considered it a safety factor. 73, Jerry, K0CQ _____________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00013.html (12,514 bytes)
68. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:34:55 -0600; Not really a 400% error, more like a 1/2% error based on absolute temperature. 73, Jerry, K0CQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.c; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00014.html (8,170 bytes)
69. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com; Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:00:55 -0400; Mike, Are you sure your Omni VI should not have left the factory delivering only 80 watts? For that matter, what was it's power output when it left the factory? I ask that because there is a target s; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00015.html (13,996 bytes)
70. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "ROD" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 15:12:45 -0400; no power output indicator update is coming from TenTec for the Eagle. I was told it can not be done. so go buy a swr power output meter. The speedometer in my Rav 4 is off by 2 MPH. The outside temp; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00016.html (12,569 bytes)
71. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 19:47:39 +0000 (UTC); Yeah, I know, and I should have said 200%, to base it on the false reference of 1 degree. Always love your comments Jerry. Even the ones I have trouble understanding (not your fault, but my lack of k; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00017.html (9,201 bytes)
72. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: Steve Berg <wa9jml@tbc.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:20:31 -0500; When I worked in the Motorola factory back in the early 1970s, we had a calibrated Bird wattmeter on each systems test bench, and a reasonably accurate DC voltmeter as well. We could take the same ra; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00018.html (15,980 bytes)
73. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 15:52:39 -0700 (PDT); So let me ask this, if your radio put out 110 watts, should you send Ten-Tec a check for another 10% for the added power. George, W6GF In the 50s cars left Detroit with speedometers that read; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00019.html (13,145 bytes)
74. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 19:44:35 -0400; Apropos to what Gerry and some others have said, I thought most ham type watt meters had two factors that made it difficult to know if one's power output is up to spec: 1) Typical meters have up to 1; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00020.html (10,096 bytes)
75. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:02:08 -0400; I'll keep this short as two thumb typing is hard to do. I understand the electronic aspect of it as well as the tolerance and logarithm of real power in the real world. Please, please, please underst; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00022.html (9,723 bytes)
76. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: Ray Sills <raysills@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:21:08 -0400; Well... Ten Tec does offer a 30 day return policy. If you are not happy, send it back. Sure... it could be a QC issue at the factory. Or maybe a decision to pass as "up to spec" items that are in a c; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00024.html (10,914 bytes)
77. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:33:01 -0400; The radio is a few years old. And has done this since day one. It's a keeper. I like the radio. I own over thirty rigs made by TT. The omni 7 is not sold as mil spec. It's nor priced at mil spec eith; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00025.html (9,759 bytes)
78. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "Walt Amos" <waltk8cv4612amos@att.net>; Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:35:44 -0400; Well, that was revealing! Mine puts out 85W on 160 and 80 meters 80 watts on 40 meters 70 watts on 20 meters 60 watts on 10 meters into a heathkit dummy load and a drake 2700 ATU wattmeter. I have se; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00026.html (11,153 bytes)
79. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 18:42:59 -0600; And that's 10% of full scale, not of the reading. Bird slugs lose precision at low levels where the diode threshold for forward conducting is a serious fraction of the applied voltage. Part of the re; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00027.html (13,858 bytes)
80. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:59:09 -0400; Hi Mike -- I fully sympathize with your point in your position. I agree the rig should be as advertised. As I wrestle with the issue, myself considering the tolerance issues and the fact that meters; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00029.html (11,185 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]