Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Eagle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Eagle\s*$/: 173 ]

Total 173 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 21:37:09 -0400; I have access to a very expensive motorla comm analyzer. $50k, calibrated to traceable standards. My personal coaxial dynamic watt meter and if course a 50 ohm dummy load. So, I am not using an old r; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00032.html (12,044 bytes)
82. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: Greg S <oldlongbeard@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 19:23:45 -0700 (PDT); Jerry- as to "most easily accomplished" for checking a speedometer, I gotta believe a GPS is more accurate, and a HECK of a lot easier, isn't it??....... and, MikeI have a solution to your frets abou; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00034.html (10,341 bytes)
83. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:38:20 -0600; GPS with RTK like farmers use is quite accurate taking out the variability of short term propagation and the randomness built into the GPS system. Raw GPS varies the position while still and changes; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00035.html (11,112 bytes)
84. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 00:03:56 -0400; Thanks, Mike. Again, to clarify, I was not being critical by my question. I appreciate your answer - and I think it makes a prima facie persuasive case, perhaps shifting of the burden (onus) to TenTe; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00038.html (9,972 bytes)
85. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 15:27:54 -0700; For those who feel slighted at not getting a full 100 watts on all bands, has anyone taken the time to call Tech. Support at Ten-Tec to ask why this is happening? I'm not sure if John Henry monitors; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00046.html (9,237 bytes)
86. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "Don Jones" <ko7i@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 17:21:01 -0700; Power dB = 10LOG*(P1/P2). Question #1, do you have a calibrated volt meter? Might be useful to check your input voltage. Question #2, is your "50 ohm load" calibrated? Question #3, I am not familiar; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00047.html (13,351 bytes)
87. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "Don Jones" <ko7i@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 17:22:20 -0700; Yea what Lee said! Perfect! I have three watt meters here and all three of them give me different readings. Bottom line, unless you are using a calibrated power meter, any power meter a ham uses or p; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00048.html (10,978 bytes)
88. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 18:33:35 -0600; That's fine formula for gain and loss based on power ratios, but not a great benefit in figuring power to a dummy load with a voltmeter. And what you use as a indicator for the dummy load affects the; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00049.html (11,117 bytes)
89. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 18:40:17 -0600; As I've said before and not long ago, a 12 volt PA is very sensitive to supply voltage and that affects its power output considerably. Even a tenth of a volt will change the power significantly becau; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00050.html (9,928 bytes)
90. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: mike bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 21:31:58 -0400; yes, calibrated dummy load HP calibrated voltmeter comm analyzer rated for HF use Mike, WB8VGE SunLight Energy Systems The Heathkit Shop http://www.theheathkitshop.com/ J e e p o|||||||o A man with o; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00051.html (14,543 bytes)
91. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "Don Jones" <flash.bang@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 17:12:10 -0700; Yea what Lee said! Perfect! I have three watt meters here and all three of them give me different readings. Bottom line, unless you are using a calibrated power meter, any power meter a ham uses or p; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00054.html (10,922 bytes)
92. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "Don Jones" <ko7i@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 17:21:25 -0700; For those of us simpletons on here, the power ratio formula was noted because 80W is 0.969100130080564 dB down from 100W. Don Jones Arlington, WA That's fine formula for gain and loss based on power; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00062.html (11,678 bytes)
93. [TenTec] EAGLE (score: 1): Author: "ROD" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:14:36 -0400; I DO NOT THINK THAT THE RF GAIN ON THE EAGLE GOES DOWN FAR ENOUGH , LIKE THE ONMI 7 OR MY ORION11. I COULD TURN DOWN THE RF ON THE OMNI AND ORION FAR ENOUGH TO QUITE THE RECIEVER. ___________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00228.html (7,742 bytes)
94. [TenTec] EAGLE (score: 1): Author: "Bob DeLorenzo" <ny2q@mikedelo.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:11:25 -0400; I am suprised that very little has been discussed about the Eagle transceiver.It sure looks like a nice rig. Could it be that so few have been sold? The receiver specs draw circles around my Jupiter.; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00345.html (8,295 bytes)
95. Re: [TenTec] EAGLE (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py2@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:18:39 -0400; There's a Yahoo list for the Eagle. Lot's have been said about it and Tentec is selling a lot of them. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Dr. Hays, NC 28635 www.n4py.com _____________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00346.html (8,749 bytes)
96. Re: [TenTec] EAGLE (score: 1): Author: "Fabrizio iz2kxc" <iz2kxc@tiscali.it>; Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:39:26 +0200; Since the end of september,2010 I had read 923 message on Yahoo 's Eagle list : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TenTec_Eagle/ Not too bad for few sold item..... Enjoy the list ,Bob ! 73 Fabrizio IZ2KXC; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00347.html (9,586 bytes)
97. Re: [TenTec] EAGLE (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 23:38:30 -0400; I think TT did exactly what it set out to do, when they say they intended to slide the new model into the lineup without overriding or crowding any of their other rigs. I compared the entire Eagle fe; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00350.html (9,687 bytes)
98. [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: John Molenda <cdistflatfoot@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 14:52:20 -0400; Hello all, Does any one have the eagle hooked up to the SGC smart power cube ? If so is the hook up simple ? is there any thing I need to look out for ? I am thinking of putting the eagle in my truck; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00001.html (6,599 bytes)
99. [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "ROD" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:48:01 -0400; I GOT A 2.8 FILTER FOR MY EAGLE AND NOW I GET VERY GOOD AUDIO REPORTS USING THE 709 TETEC MIKE, ALSO WHEN I PUT THE 2.8 FILTER I NOW THE DSP FILTERS GO UP TO 6000 ON THE 2.4 OR 2.8.FILTERS. _________; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-06/msg00020.html (6,433 bytes)
100. Re: [TenTec] eagle (score: 1): Author: "Walt Amos" <waltk8cv4612amos@att.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:52:55 -0400; Ah ........... DUDE -- does this make sense? 2,800 roofing filter and 6,000 band pass filter? Why does this work? What am I missing? My marbles? Yeah, probably :-) Walt K8CV Royal Oak, MI. __________; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-06/msg00021.html (7,493 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]