Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Eagle\s+NB\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Eagle\s+NB\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Eagle NB (score: 1): Author: Paul DeWitte <k9ot@yousq.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2019 07:51:12 -0500; We have 2 Eagles here. Both with the noise blanker installed. I also have an electric fence that pulses on and off. The Eagle that we have had for several years takes most of the fencer noise out. Th; /archives//html/TenTec/2019-08/msg00004.html (6,824 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Eagle NB (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2019 10:19:59 -0500; Are both radios at the same firmware release? Kim N5OP The Eagle that we have had for several years takes most of the fencer noise out. The one that I bought recently, does not. I have tried it in bo; /archives//html/TenTec/2019-08/msg00005.html (7,952 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Eagle NB (score: 1): Author: Mike Schatzberg <cherokeehillfarm@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2019 13:10:12 -0400; The filter bandwidth may be different also. Wider filters will let the blanker algorithm work more effectively. I do not have this model myself, but does the blanker unplug so you can swap in the wor; /archives//html/TenTec/2019-08/msg00006.html (9,121 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Eagle NB (score: 1): Author: Paul DeWitte <k9ot@yousq.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 11:24:01 -0500; I have had several replies about the NB, and I thank all of you The only difference that I see in the 2 radios, is the firmware. Mine is 2003 and the other one is 1820 something. If anyone is using 2; /archives//html/TenTec/2019-08/msg00019.html (7,495 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]