Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Eagle\s+comparison\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Eagle\s+comparison\s*$/: 52 ]

Total 52 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: Steve Berg <wa9jml@tbc.net>; Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 19:04:32 -0600; Stuart, I read through the list, but it has been so many years since I did any engineering work, I was not familiar with a lot of the nomenclature. One faction on this list is more competitive than I; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00194.html (10,050 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 20:16:01 -0800 (PST); Although the Sherwood list is important information it should not be the only criteria used to select a radio. I am a sport car collector. We have a saying, you do not drive the performance numbers; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00197.html (11,782 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: John Molenda <cdistflatfoot@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:20:52 -0500; sage advise ! John kb2huk _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00198.html (12,691 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: geoffrey mendelson <geoffreymendelson@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 06:22:17 +0200; I expect that we really would be spending our time talking about putting Corvair engines in Volkswagen beetles. :-) (you can draw whatever parallel to radios you wish) 73, Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mende; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00199.html (9,152 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: John Graves <jh.graves@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:42:03 -0500; Seeing how you raised the subject, perhaps you have driven a Corvair ragtop with a blown engine.....and I don't mean broken.......or do you have one of the Ct race preped Corvairs in the garage. Ah w; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00206.html (9,264 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: navydude1962@yahoo.com; Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:39:56 +0000; John....how does the 590 compare to the K3? Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry --Original Message-- From: John Molenda <cdistflatfoot@gmail.com> Sender: tentec-bounces@contesting.com Date: Tue,; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00209.html (13,562 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:51:20 -0800 (PST); Strictly on the basis of performance.....toss a coin. There are other factors that may make a difference to you George John....how does the 590 compare to the K3? Sent from my Verizon Wireless Black; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00212.html (14,161 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:04:31 -0500; I have driven a Corvair ... but I prefer the latest newest gear - both radios and automobiles - picture me fitting a new TT radio in the "trunk" of my BMW Z4 M roadster during a ten day road trip ! M; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00217.html (9,185 bytes)
29. [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: "Henry, John" <jhenry@tentec.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:33:12 -0500; Ah, but I would so much prefer a 1969 Shelby GT 500 KR convertible over the Mustang of today, oops, sorry, off topic.... lol John _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list T; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00219.html (7,869 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:08:29 -0600; Hi Steve, Yes, isn't it interesting how well some of the older designs compare with current new radios? Collins knew what they were doing most of the time. They had many talented engineers along with; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00222.html (12,971 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:12:21 -0600; My comments on the Sherwood list utility as a decision aid, are based on personally listening to Sherwood's presentations, and respect for his careful analysis. If he finds a receiver superior, it is; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00224.html (11,099 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:42:28 -0500; Yaesu published a full sized photo of the FT5000 and when I set it on the desk, my wife exclaimed at how just plain huge it is and how it would swallow up the entire desk - and then asked if it was r; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00225.html (9,999 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:53:49 -0600; Stuart, The Argonaut V's receiver is really not in the class of the other rigs we have been talking about. It's great as a QRP radio or casual radio, and especially for camping vacations, etc., but t; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00226.html (14,666 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: "Dave Plews" <djplews@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 22:14:30 -0600; Rick, Many years ago I had the Viking Navigator and an RME-4350. Truly a nice outfit in it's day. My first field day in 1963 I was introduced to the Viking Valiant and a Drake 2B with Q-multiplier an; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00227.html (10,510 bytes)
35. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:17:23 -0600; Rick, Well, I used both my Scout and the Argo V at Field Days, but not side by side, so I just did not notice that much difference in the receivers, but then we were using them for SSB stations. I ha; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00228.html (9,120 bytes)
36. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:20:28 -0600; Better that Richards wife told him she did not like the radio when it was only the full size photo mock up! Yaesu has made some big radios. -Stuart K5KVH _____________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00229.html (9,544 bytes)
37. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 22:57:04 -0600; Yes, it followed in the physical layout, but not at all in the design of the circuitry. There's not much learning curve for an Eagle. I think it's a perfect rig for a Field Day. We had a K3 at Field; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00231.html (10,470 bytes)
38. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 23:08:35 -0600; Dave, As a Novice, I thought the Navigator was the Mercedes/Cadillac/Rolls Royce of transmitters. But I upgraded quickly, so I preferred the Ranger. The valiant was nothing but a dream for me (as a t; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00232.html (12,057 bytes)
39. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:41:08 -0600; That big size kept the 127 myriad dials, knobs, and buttons from overlapping or from manly finger tips hitting more than one at a time. 73, Jerry, K0CQ _______________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00235.html (10,834 bytes)
40. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:35:06 -0500; For my Radio club the older Triton 4/544 5 band transceiver is the ideal FD rig. Simple, functional, FD bands only, no learning curve, and not expensive. We use two or three of them, with transmit ba; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00236.html (9,483 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]