Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Eagle\s+receiver\s+on\s+general\s+coverage\s+$was\:\s+new\s+RX366\s+sub\s+receiver$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Eagle\s+receiver\s+on\s+general\s+coverage\s+$was\:\s+new\s+RX366\s+sub\s+receiver$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Eagle receiver on general coverage (was: new RX366 sub receiver) (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 21:52:35 +0000; Have any Eagle owners done some SWL'ing with their rigs and can offer some comments on the general coverage performance? Thanks & 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-10/msg00114.html (10,814 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Eagle receiver on general coverage (was: new RX366 sub receiver) (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:04:32 +0200; Hi, When I first got my Eagle, while still living in Oklahoma, I did a quick comparison to my Lowe HF-225, which is a pretty darn good GC receiver. I didn't do much on the SWL bands, because the Eagl; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-10/msg00120.html (12,786 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]