Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Eagle\s+vs\.\s+TS\-590S\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Eagle\s+vs\.\s+TS\-590S\s*$/: 47 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: G Reichow <wa0yle12@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 10:16:02 -0500; Hello all, I am in the market for a new radio. Originally I was looking at the FTDX-1200 and the TS-590S as both of those are within my budget. Now, with the mega-sale, the Eagle is within my budget; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00136.html (7,858 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: Toby Pennington <w4cakk@centurylink.net>; Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 11:21:34 -0400; So, you have come to the Ten Tec list for an independent, impartial, report. HMMM! Toby K4NH On 7/6/2014 11:16 AM, G Reichow wrote: Hello all, I am in the market for a new radio. Originally I was loo; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00137.html (8,461 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 17:33:21 +0200; The Eagle has a slightly better receiver, especially on the higher bands. The ergonomics of the Kenwood are more typical of what most people are familiar with. Unfortunately Omnirig does not support; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00138.html (10,426 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 08:30:17 -0700; I would take the Eagle over any Kenwood! Clayton N4EV So, you have come to the Ten Tec list for an independent, impartial, report. HMMM! Toby K4NH _____________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00139.html (9,115 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 17:38:08 +0200; I would definitely take the TS-990 over the Eagle. But that's just about the only radio I would take. Well, maybe a PT-8000 too! 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) I would take the Eagle over a; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00140.html (9,513 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: Dave Edwards <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 12:19:43 -0400; I would choose the Kenwood if I had to make a choice. ...Dave On 7/6/14, 11:16 AM, G Reichow wrote: Hello all, I am in the market for a new radio. Originally I was looking at the FTDX-1200 and the TS; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00141.html (8,056 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: JB Edmonds <n4nqy@jbedmonds.com>; Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 13:27:19 -0400; I think the Kenwood and Eagle are a toss up. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00143.html (8,733 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: Toby Pennington <w4cakk@centurylink.net>; Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 13:42:36 -0400; Well, perhaps I was too judgemental, you guys are offering pretty good advice.. If the user interface on the 590 is much better than the Eagle, I would go with the 590 other things being equal. Toby; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00144.html (8,949 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: Mike Schatzberg <cherokeehillfarm@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 14:09:02 -0400; I have enjoyed the 590 both in my station with a large monoband array, and portable with a fan dipole. The receiver is simply amazing in every aspect. The human interface is simply superb and offers; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00145.html (11,588 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: Wade Staggs <tvman1954@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 13:29:56 -0500; Having used the TS-450 and the TS-590S, They are both decent radio's. Bob/K4TAX sent me an Eagle to Test Drive for a Month or so. My regular rig is a Paragon. Being accustomed to the almost Brick Wal; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00146.html (11,426 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: G Reichow <wa0yle12@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 14:27:29 -0500; Thanks Rick, this is the kind of information I'm looking for and all the responses so far have been very helpful. I read this reflector every day and it always has good info. Gary - KN0V ____________; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00149.html (12,867 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 23:53:48 +0200; Mike, you are incorrect with your take on ALC upgrades. Here in Europe we have authorized Kenwood dealers, and then others. The "others" import from somewhere else and are called the "Gray Channel".; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00155.html (12,817 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: Mike Schatzberg <cherokeehillfarm@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 18:10:11 -0400; Sorry but Kenwood does not charge at their service centers on the east or west coast here in the USA. Mike W2AJI Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing lis; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00158.html (14,933 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 00:18:21 +0200; Well they certainly do here in Europe! Consider yourself lucky. 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) Sorry but Kenwood does not charge at their service centers on the east or west coast here in t; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00159.html (15,383 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 15:34:46 -0700; In terms of equal performance, JB, I would tend to agree. Not sure if it was on this list or the Elecraft list, but there was a French ham who did an A/B/C comparison of the Eagle, K3 and TS-590. For; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00160.html (9,055 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 17:51:44 -0500; One thing to consider: atthe stated prices, you could buy and Eagle and try it out. If you find the ergonomics truly distasteful, you could probably turn around and sell it (after the end of July) fo; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00164.html (14,200 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: Mike Schatzberg <cherokeehillfarm@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 19:08:26 -0400; I waited to buy until the factory modified the new boards. My radio was built this past March and was modified at the factory. Apparently not many people have experienced problems with production fro; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00165.html (17,354 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 19:18:59 -0400; No -- shame on guys who buy outside the authorized dealer channel - If you don't buy a warranty, then don't complain you paid less and cannot get warranty service. -- That's my take. - JR -- Here in; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00168.html (9,351 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 19:39:46 -0400; I wouldn't go that far. I don't know about EU, but I do know that in the US at one time, someone had to have been in busy for at least a year and be doing a minimum dollar value of retail business be; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00170.html (11,350 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 19:57:18 -0400; I OWNED A 590 AND SOLD IT. GOOD RADIO. GOOD RECEIVER. GOOD VALUE. THE EAGLE SHOULD BE BETTER - in raw transmitter and receiver performance. You can't go wrong with either rig. Period. So the decision; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00171.html (15,318 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]