Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Enhanced\s+SSB\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Enhanced\s+SSB\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1): Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Sat Apr 19 11:50:43 2003; I suspect any early radio SSB was derived from wire line multiplex and probably based on LC filters at some convenient frequency like 15 or 20 KHz. Western Electric had the engineering services of th; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00521.html (8,970 bytes)
22. [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Sat Apr 19 13:12:50 2003; What are the advantages of transmitting voice frequency components in the range of 50 to 300 Hz? 73/72, George Amateur Radio W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in Collin; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00523.html (11,284 bytes)
23. [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sat Apr 19 14:06:06 2003; Hmmm....to use up the extra power from the linear?? Or, maybe you were assigned the bass line in the quartet? 73, Jim KH7M; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00526.html (8,765 bytes)
24. [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Sat Apr 19 14:28:51 2003; Sorta tough to answer, huh? <:} 73/72, George Amateur Radio W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in Collin county EM13QE "In the 57th year and it just keeps getting better!; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00527.html (9,688 bytes)
25. [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1): Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Sat Apr 19 14:41:32 2003; Not at all hard to answer, just hard to answer without buckets of sarcasm. The main reason I see is to transmit the "golden" basso profundo radio announcer tones at great expense in transmitter power; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00528.html (10,669 bytes)
26. [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1): Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen, Esq.); Date: Sat Apr 19 15:10:25 2003; 50-100 Hz...zero. 100-300 Hz. Better balance with the area above 1K and perhaps less listening fatigue over extended periods of time. George, I think we all know that 300 Hz to 2 kHz in AM or SSB is; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00530.html (9,049 bytes)
27. [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1): Author: n4py@earthlink.net (Carl Moreschi); Date: Sat Apr 19 16:34:50 2003; Simply because it sounds nice. Carl Moreschi N4PY Franklinton, NC -- Original Message -- From: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2003 5:12 PM Subject; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00535.html (12,040 bytes)
28. [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Sat Apr 19 17:28:58 2003; Hi, Paul Thanks for the informative response. Although my receiver and audio system will go down to 30 Hz or so, I have not been able to notice any beneficial effect or advantage from those stations; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00537.html (11,174 bytes)
29. [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Sat Apr 19 17:33:48 2003; Can't argue that, Carl, especially under the right conditions! 73/72, George Amateur Radio W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in Collin county EM13QE "In the 57th year an; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00538.html (8,584 bytes)
30. [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Sat Apr 19 17:41:52 2003; Aw, c'mon, George, that question is simply meant to provoke. You already know why! Look, I can be just as silly: For that matter, What are the advantages of transmitting a signal with more than 25 W; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00539.html (13,883 bytes)
31. [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Sat Apr 19 18:15:21 2003; Al, I am sorry that you had to take so much time to attempt to ridicule me on the reflector for asking a sincere technical question . Seems like some folks on here have to play policeman these days t; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00540.html (15,945 bytes)
32. [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L Martin); Date: Sat Apr 19 19:24:14 2003; This thread....and its seemingly neverending non-Ten-Tec-related chatter.... Some things never change. Pity. Yet a good reminder why I had previously quit this reflector and why I'm doing it again...; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00542.html (8,638 bytes)
33. [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Sat Apr 19 20:43:29 2003; Yes, George, I'm sorry I didn't get the tone of sincerity that I should have from your post, but you gotta understand that when you follow up a post with a "Sorta hard to answer, eh?" post it casts d; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00546.html (18,979 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 33
Page: [1] [2]