Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Even\s+More\s+Anecdotal\s+NR\s+observations\s+\-\-\s+Orion\s+II\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Even\s+More\s+Anecdotal\s+NR\s+observations\s+\-\-\s+Orion\s+II\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Even More Anecdotal NR observations -- Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:45:11 -0600; CW this time. I spent a few hours this afternoon hunting on 20M for the weakest puniest CW signals I could find. Admittedly, the band noise was low -- not even moving the meter. Which doesn't mean yo; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00407.html (8,604 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Even More Anecdotal NR observations -- Orion II (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 08:41:28 EST; I had a little more time yesterday to experiment with NR. My feeling now is it is working better than I originally thought, even though I hope it goes back to more like 1.371 still. Now I see why I a; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00426.html (8,201 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]