Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+F\.S\.\s+New\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+715\s+RF\s+Processor\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] F.S. New Ten Tec 715 RF Processor (score: 1)
Author: Joe W2KJ <w2kj@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:06:44 -0500
Howdy Gang: Last year I bought a model 715 RF Speech Processor from Ten Tec and played with it for several months with my Drake gear but couldn't get the audio to sound good. A couple of weeks ago I
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00196.html (9,037 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] F.S. New Ten Tec 715 RF Processor (score: 1)
Author: José Félix Ballester <jfballester@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:14:04 -0400
Works FB with my TenTec Eagle. 73 de Pepe WP3HW Howdy Gang: Last year I bought a model 715 RF Speech Processor from Ten Tec and played with it for several months with my Drake gear but couldn't get t
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00198.html (9,566 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] F.S. New Ten Tec 715 RF Processor (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:20:33 -0500
It sounds like you might possibly have had an impedance mismatch. Most attend tech equipment and other modern equipment uses low impedance microphones, around 600 ohms. If you use microphones like th
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00200.html (10,369 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] F.S. New Ten Tec 715 RF Processor (score: 1)
Author: Steve Berg <wa9jml@frontier.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:48:06 -0600
I use a 715 with my Corsair II, Argonaut II and Argonaut VI. It works great! Might the problems you are seeing be related to impedance matching? There are a number of people here on the list who are
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00202.html (8,078 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] F.S. New Ten Tec 715 RF Processor (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:52:50 +0100
Be careful on the 444's. Over the years they changed impedance. I have two of them, one is about 40+ years old, the other about 20, and they have completely different impedance. Can't remember which
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00203.html (10,867 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] F.S. New Ten Tec 715 RF Processor (score: 1)
Author: Joe W2KJ <w2kj@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:35:30 -0500
Howdy Bry: The 444D can be switched between HI and LO impedance...so that's not the problem...I also used a 600 ohm headset with similar results....it's not a mike impedance problem. 73, Joe W2KJ ___
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00204.html (11,813 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] F.S. New Ten Tec 715 RF Processor (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:44:53 -0600
I did one of the published reviews. In my use and testing on the bench, I did find that the 715 does exactly what it is designed and advertised to do and that is to limit the transmit audio bandwidth
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00205.html (11,301 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] F.S. New Ten Tec 715 RF Processor (score: 1)
Author: "73@73.am" <73@73.am>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:45:51 -0600
Ill take it, can send PayPal or a check! Vy 73 de Paul W8ZO _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tent
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00206.html (10,559 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] F.S. New Ten Tec 715 RF Processor (score: 1)
Author: Joe W2KJ <w2kj@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:52:46 -0500
W8ZO....please send me your email address....your response went to the list and not to me directly. Many thanks, Joe W2KJ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@co
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00207.html (8,129 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] F.S. New Ten Tec 715 RF Processor (score: 1)
Author: "73@73.am" <73@73.am>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:04:09 -0600
Oh heck: sorry. This is one of the few lists that reply goes to the entire list! Most reflectors use reply-all for sending to the list and reply" to, well, reply to the poster. I sent you a private e
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00209.html (9,581 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] F.S. New Ten Tec 715 RF Processor (score: 1)
Author: "Bry Carling" <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 21:12:36 -0500
OK thanks - interesting. Who knows then. Must be something magic about those Tentec microphones and processors. It could be that the signal level is vastly different from what is expected by the proc
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00214.html (13,444 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] F.S. New Ten Tec 715 RF Processor (score: 1)
Author: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 21:09:07 -0600
Set your radio mic gain with the TT-715 in the OUT position. The TT-715 has an output level setting on the back. With the PROC Gain set to about seven o'clock or just about 6 dB of clipping you shoul
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00218.html (14,244 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] F.S. New Ten Tec 715 RF Processor (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:01:55 -0600
In my use and testing on the bench, I did find that the 715 does exactly what it is designed and advertised to do and that is to limit the transmit audio bandwidth and compress the dynamic range thus
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00219.html (16,554 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu